2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting surface roughness on SLS parts with various measuring techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such evaluation is based on cross-sectional lines which may not well represent the inherent differences among these systems. To address such issue, some researchers proposed to inspect the arithmetic mean height of the surface which takes all the surface data into consideration [13,14]. Although the entire surface data points are utilized, the surface roughness parameters are essentially aggregated features of the data, and the geometric distributions of data points may be neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such evaluation is based on cross-sectional lines which may not well represent the inherent differences among these systems. To address such issue, some researchers proposed to inspect the arithmetic mean height of the surface which takes all the surface data into consideration [13,14]. Although the entire surface data points are utilized, the surface roughness parameters are essentially aggregated features of the data, and the geometric distributions of data points may be neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughness measuring methods include laser reflectivity, contact stylus tracing, tactile profile measurement, focus variation, fringe projection technique and confocal laser scanning microscope [31,32]. Sun et al presented a novel method based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) for making intelligent surface roughness identifications and achieved high-precision surface roughness estimation [33].…”
Section: Morphology Observation By 3d Optical Profilermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point cloud of each scanning line includes 1280 points. Due to the surface roughness, surface contamination, and material reflection, noise is inevitably produced during detection [11]. Although the output point cloud was preprocessed by the scanning device itself, the noise points contained in each scan line are limited.…”
Section: Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%