2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00388.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Trends in the Prediction of the Buried Past: A Review of Geophysical Techniques in Archaeology*

Abstract: Bradford Scholars -how to deposit your paper Overview Copyright check• Check if your publisher allows submission to a repository.• Use the Sherpa RoMEO database if you are not sure about your publisher's position or email openaccess@bradford.ac.uk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
101
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Geophysical prospection methods employed in archaeology [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] frequently include soil electrical resistivity measurements, caesium-vapour and vertical gradient magnetometry, which are regarded, alongside GPR [57], as the most efficient methods of archaeological prospecting. All except the last were utilised in this study.…”
Section: Geophysical Prospectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical prospection methods employed in archaeology [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] frequently include soil electrical resistivity measurements, caesium-vapour and vertical gradient magnetometry, which are regarded, alongside GPR [57], as the most efficient methods of archaeological prospecting. All except the last were utilised in this study.…”
Section: Geophysical Prospectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic surveys, one of the most common surface-based geophysical methods employed at archaeological sites, have proven successful in detecting and delineating both historic and prehistoric features [4,5]. Magnetic surveys, however, may not supply the detail desired on the dimensions or depth of an archaeological feature, its magnetic susceptibility and remanence, or internal variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in-shore implementation of diverse geophysical prospection methods has nowadays become an integral part of archaeological research in planned and rescue excavations or regional archaeological surveys, providing a non-destructive and rapid mapping of a site without disturbing the ground or the monuments themselves [2][3][4]. The following overview of relevant geophysical applications in marine contexts, though far from exhaustive, helps to define the framework in which this research sits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%