2017
DOI: 10.1101/183210
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and accurate False Discovery Rate control of differentially methylated regions from Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing

Abstract: Summary 10With recent advances in sequencing technology, it is now feasible to measure DNA methylation 11 at tens of millions of sites across the entire genome. In most applications, biologists are 12 interested in detecting differentially methylated regions, composed of multiple sites with 13 differing methylation levels among populations. However, current computational approaches for 14 detecting such regions do not provide accurate statistical inference. A major challenge in 15 reporting uncertainty is that… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We designed the oligo‐pool to tile each of the 38 lncRNAs with a 10‐nt shift between sequential oligonucleotides. This densely overlapping tiling approach offers us a unique advantage of allowing the computational “stitching” of sequential oligos (Jaffe et al , ; preprint: Korthauer et al , ), thus enabling identification of longer regions required for nuclear enrichment. Second, we cloned the pool of oligonucleotides to the 3′ end of a cytosolic‐localized Sox2 construct ( fsSox2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We designed the oligo‐pool to tile each of the 38 lncRNAs with a 10‐nt shift between sequential oligonucleotides. This densely overlapping tiling approach offers us a unique advantage of allowing the computational “stitching” of sequential oligos (Jaffe et al , ; preprint: Korthauer et al , ), thus enabling identification of longer regions required for nuclear enrichment. Second, we cloned the pool of oligonucleotides to the 3′ end of a cytosolic‐localized Sox2 construct ( fsSox2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing reads were preprocessed, aligned to the human genome, and converted to CpG methylation count matrices with CpG_Me (v1.0, [69][70][71] autoregressive correlated error structure as implemented in the dmrseq package [79,80]. In this approach, candidate regions are identified based on consistent differences in mean methylation between groups, and region-level statistics are estimated which account for coverage, mean methylation, and correlation between CpGs.…”
Section: Wgbs Read Alignment and Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DMBs were also identified with the dmrseq() function using the default parameters for blocks, except the single CpG methylation difference coefficient cutoff was set to 0.01 and the minimum number of CpGs was set to 3. As described in the dmrseq package vignette [79], the default parameters for DMBs differ from those for DMRs in that the minimum width for DMBs is 5 kilobases and the maximum gap between CpGs in a DMB is also 5 kilobases. Additionally, the smoothing span window is widened by setting the minimum CpGs in a smoothing window to 500, the width of the window to 50 kilobases, and the maximum gap between CpGs in the same smoothing cluster to 1 megabase.…”
Section: Wgbs Read Alignment and Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DMRs were called utilizing the DMRichR workflow (https://github.com/benlaufer/DMRichR). This workflow primarily utilizes the dmrseq 54 and bsseq 55 packages for inference of the DMRs and the annotatr 56 and ChIPseeker 57 packages for gene symbol, gene region, and CpG annotations. Briefly, CpG count matrixes (Bismark cytosine reports) were processed to merge symmetric CpG sites across strands and filtered for at least 1x coverage across samples.…”
Section: Differentially Methylated Regions (Dmrs) and Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%