2018
DOI: 10.1101/249219
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and benchmarking of somatic mutations in cancer genomes using RNA-seq data

Abstract: To detect functional somatic mutations in tumor samples, whole-exome sequencing (WES) is often used for its reliability and relative low cost. RNA-seq, while generally used to measure gene expression, can potentially also be used for identification of somatic mutations. However there has been little systematic evaluation of the utility of RNA-seq for identifying somatic mutations. Here, we develop and evaluate a pipeline for processing RNA-seq data from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors in order to identify… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MuTect behaviour is due to the clustered events filter which removes variants found on haplotypes where other variants are already detected ( Figure S2). This behaviour was also observed in a previous study comparing variants called from matched RNA-Seq and WES samples where the same flag was responsible for filtering the largest number of RNA variants [14]. Using knowledge from external databases allows retention of two NRAS SNVs present in COS-MIC [10], which are discarded by default-filters as they are also present in the PON samples at very low frequency.…”
Section: Sensitivity In the Leucegene Cohortsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…MuTect behaviour is due to the clustered events filter which removes variants found on haplotypes where other variants are already detected ( Figure S2). This behaviour was also observed in a previous study comparing variants called from matched RNA-Seq and WES samples where the same flag was responsible for filtering the largest number of RNA variants [14]. Using knowledge from external databases allows retention of two NRAS SNVs present in COS-MIC [10], which are discarded by default-filters as they are also present in the PON samples at very low frequency.…”
Section: Sensitivity In the Leucegene Cohortsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…5b). Limited overlap between point mutations identified in both DNA and RNA sequencing has been observed in non-small cell lung cancer as well as glioblastoma suggesting that this finding is not unique to OS 23,24 . In addition, few predicted rearrangements involving coding regions were expressed ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, some of the discrepancies can be also due to low coverage in the genome sequence, which generated a falsenegative in the calling. Although calling variants from RNA-Seq data has been shown to be more challenging, it is an interesting alternative for genome sequencing and a large amount of tumor RNA-seq samples do not have normal matched data [39,40].…”
Section: Variant Identification On Rna-seqmentioning
confidence: 99%