Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks 2014
DOI: 10.4108/icst.crowncom.2014.255390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Channel Estimation in 8x8 MIMO-OFDM

Abstract: Higher data rate and lower power consumption requirements set new challenges for implementation of multiple-input multipleoutput orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (MIMO-OFDM) receivers. Simple detectors have low complexity and power consumption, but the performance is worse than with more complex detectors. Therefore the detector can be adapted to suit the channel conditions to minimize the power consumption while satisfying the quality of service requirements. The performances of the linear minimum m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results presented in [9][10][11][12] show that in an uncorrelated channel, the LMMSE detector is able to outperform the K-best LSD, but as the correlation increases, the opportunities to use the LMMSE detector become scarce. In the 8×8 MIMO system, the LMMSE detector is unable to separate all the spatial streams, and, therefore, it is performing poorly compared to the K-best LSD.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation results presented in [9][10][11][12] show that in an uncorrelated channel, the LMMSE detector is able to outperform the K-best LSD, but as the correlation increases, the opportunities to use the LMMSE detector become scarce. In the 8×8 MIMO system, the LMMSE detector is unable to separate all the spatial streams, and, therefore, it is performing poorly compared to the K-best LSD.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSFE detector was unable to outperform the K-best LSD and was occasionally outperformed by the LMMSE detector. The performances of the LMMSE and K-best detectors in 4 × 4 and 8 × 8 MIMO-OFDM systems with HARQ were compared in [11]. The performance-energy efficiency comparison between the K-best LSD and LMMSE detector were presented in [12] for the 4 × 4 and 8 × 8 systems with HARQ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%