2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and characterisation of the biopollutant Xenostrobus securis (Lamarck 1819) Asturian population from DNA Barcoding and eBarcoding

Abstract: DNA efficiently contributes to detect and understand marine invasions. In 2014 the potential biological pollutant pygmy mussel (Xenostrobus securis) was observed for the first time in the Avilés estuary (Asturias, Bay of Biscay). The goal of this study was to assess the stage of invasion, based on demographic and genetic (DNA Barcoding) characteristics, and to develop a molecular tool for surveying the species in environmental DNA. A total of 130 individuals were analysed for the DNA Barcode cytochrome oxidase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Early detection of invasive species is a crucial step for successful post-introduction management (Pochon, Zaiko, Hopkins, Banks, & Wood, 2015). Genetic analysis has been demonstrated to be a useful tool for inventorying biodiversity (Thorpe, Solé-Cava, & Watts, 2000;Feral, 2002) and for studying marine biological invasions (Dlugosch & Parker, 2008;Estoup & Guillemaud, 2010;Semeraro et al, 2016;Ardura et al, 2016;Devloo-Delva et al, 2016), and the advent of next generation sequencing technologies (NGS) and the possibility of directly analysing DNA from water and sediments (environmental DNA, eDNA) has opened new possibilities for early NIS detection in marine ecosystems, where invasions might remain unnoticed for extended periods (Taberlet, Coissac, Pompanon, Brochmann, & Willerslev, 2012;Freire, Genzano, Neumann-Leitao, & Perez, 2014;Zaiko et al, 2015). Furthermore, detecting short, species-specific eDNA fragments from aquatic environments is theoretically more sensitive than traditional survey methods, which can be both time-consuming and costly (Ardura, Linde, Moreira, & Garcia-Vazquez, 2010;Pochon, Bott, Smith, & Wood, 2013).…”
Section: Genusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early detection of invasive species is a crucial step for successful post-introduction management (Pochon, Zaiko, Hopkins, Banks, & Wood, 2015). Genetic analysis has been demonstrated to be a useful tool for inventorying biodiversity (Thorpe, Solé-Cava, & Watts, 2000;Feral, 2002) and for studying marine biological invasions (Dlugosch & Parker, 2008;Estoup & Guillemaud, 2010;Semeraro et al, 2016;Ardura et al, 2016;Devloo-Delva et al, 2016), and the advent of next generation sequencing technologies (NGS) and the possibility of directly analysing DNA from water and sediments (environmental DNA, eDNA) has opened new possibilities for early NIS detection in marine ecosystems, where invasions might remain unnoticed for extended periods (Taberlet, Coissac, Pompanon, Brochmann, & Willerslev, 2012;Freire, Genzano, Neumann-Leitao, & Perez, 2014;Zaiko et al, 2015). Furthermore, detecting short, species-specific eDNA fragments from aquatic environments is theoretically more sensitive than traditional survey methods, which can be both time-consuming and costly (Ardura, Linde, Moreira, & Garcia-Vazquez, 2010;Pochon, Bott, Smith, & Wood, 2013).…”
Section: Genusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus early detection of invasive species is a crucial step for successful post-introduction management (e.g. Pochon et al, 2015;Devloo-Delva et al, 2016). For the successful prevention of new invasions it is especially important to identify the main features of recipient communities that may make them resistant to invasions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of specific primers on eDNA has been successfully demonstrated for a number of species. Examples are fish Petromyzon marinus and Salmo trutta [ 32 ], molluscs such as Rangia cuneata in the Baltic Sea [ 33 ] and Xenostrobus securis in North Spain [ 34 ], and others. Potamopyrgus antipodarum has also been detected previously directly from water samples [ 35 ], as presence-absence based on positive or negative PCR amplification of a fragment of the cytochrome b gene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%