1998
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and characterization of carcinoma cells in the blood

Abstract: A highly sensitive assay combining immunomagnetic enrichment with multiparameter f low cytometric and immunocytochemical analysis has been developed to detect, enumerate, and characterize carcinoma cells in the blood. The assay can detect one epithelial cell or less in 1 ml of blood. Peripheral blood (10-20 ml) from 30 patients with carcinoma of the breast, from 3 patients with prostate cancer, and from 13 controls was examined by f low cytometry for the presence of circulating epithelial cells defined as nucl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

8
454
2
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 631 publications
(470 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
454
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of such cells could have significant clinical utility in risk stratification in early breast cancer, in early detection of relapse and in monitoring response to treatment. Cytometric techniques based on immunohistochemical analyses and nucleic acid-based approaches to cell detection have been described (Racila et al, 1998;Lambrechts et al, 1999;Smith et al, 2000;Aerts et al, 2001;Stathopoulou et al, 2002;Witzig et al, 2002). However, there is considerable variability in the reported sensitivities and specificities of existing techniques with putative carcinoma cells reported to be present in between 0 and 100% of blood samples from patients with metastatic breast cancer (Ring et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of such cells could have significant clinical utility in risk stratification in early breast cancer, in early detection of relapse and in monitoring response to treatment. Cytometric techniques based on immunohistochemical analyses and nucleic acid-based approaches to cell detection have been described (Racila et al, 1998;Lambrechts et al, 1999;Smith et al, 2000;Aerts et al, 2001;Stathopoulou et al, 2002;Witzig et al, 2002). However, there is considerable variability in the reported sensitivities and specificities of existing techniques with putative carcinoma cells reported to be present in between 0 and 100% of blood samples from patients with metastatic breast cancer (Ring et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 In spiking experiments with RCC cell lines, we determined a sensitivity of positive tumor-cell detection of 10 -7 , which is comparable to other reports. 11 In comparison to the detection of disseminated carcinoma cells, we found no false-positive cell-staining artifacts in normal blood cells. Renal cancer cell line Caki-1 had only moderate or weak CK expression detected by several specific anti-CK antibodies (CK 8-18, CK 19) and by pan-anti-CK antibody (MNF 116, AE 1-3) in the periphery of the cytoplasm, which was weaker than in MCF-7 breast-carcinoma cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…25 Additionally, a panel of molecular markers could enhance the sensitivity for CTCs detection, compared with single markers in use. 21 RT-PCR assay is by far regarded widely to be the most sensitive method for detecting tumor-associated molecular markers. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] However, for multiple gene detection, RT-PCR is too time-consuming and laborious to apply in clinical diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of heterogeneity of the expression of tumor-related genes, a multimarker assay is regarded to be more reliable and sensitive than singlemarker assay. [20][21][22] Therefore, a high-throughput assay able to detect simultaneously a panel of informative molecular markers for the presence of CTCs is in urgent need of development, today. The objective of the study was to evaluate the utility of a noninvasive, peripheral blood-based membrane-array assay detecting a panel of tumor-related mRNA markers (hTERT, CK-19, CEA and MUC1) for GC patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%