2021
DOI: 10.4103/jmss.jmss_24_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Classification of Myocardial Infarction with Support Vector Machine Classifier Using Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm

Abstract: Background: Providing a noninvasive, rapid, and cost-effective approach to diagnose of myocardial infarction (MI) is essential in the early stages of electrocardiogram (ECG) signaling. In this article, we proposed the new optimization method for support vector machine (SVM) classifier to MI classification. Methods: After preprocessing ECG signal and noise removal, three features such as Q-wave integral, T-wave integral, and QRS-complex integral have been extracted in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tree-based ML algorithmic models report high accuracy like 97.88% for Random Forest (RF), 98.23% for Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and 98.03% for Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and outperform other ML algorithms, and their performance is comparable to the highend DL architectures [2]. Apart from tree-based algorithms, other ML algorithms like Support Vector Machine (SVM) give better accuracy like 96.67% with morphological & temporal features [17], 98.33% with 220 features [18] & 100% [19], along with grasshopper optimization algorithm, 99.9% for cubic models & 99.8% for a quadratic model [20], 95.1% for Adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) [17] algorithm, and 94.9% for Logistic Regression [21].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree-based ML algorithmic models report high accuracy like 97.88% for Random Forest (RF), 98.23% for Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and 98.03% for Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and outperform other ML algorithms, and their performance is comparable to the highend DL architectures [2]. Apart from tree-based algorithms, other ML algorithms like Support Vector Machine (SVM) give better accuracy like 96.67% with morphological & temporal features [17], 98.33% with 220 features [18] & 100% [19], along with grasshopper optimization algorithm, 99.9% for cubic models & 99.8% for a quadratic model [20], 95.1% for Adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) [17] algorithm, and 94.9% for Logistic Regression [21].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%