Surface Electromyography : Physiology, Engineering, and Applications 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781119082934.ch03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Conditioning of Surface EMG Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface electrodes have usually higher electrode impedances, which is usually accompanied by increased noise levels (Grimnes, 1983). Electrode impedance and background noise also depend on the electrode types (adhesive gel or dry surface electrodes), the electrode contact surface size, and conditions at the skin, such as the presence of perspiration (Grimnes, 1983;Godin et al, 1991;Huigen et al, 2002;Roy et al, 2007;Piervirgili et al, 2014;Merletti et al, 2016). Figure 2G shows the devastating effects of pronounced surface-electrode noise on continuous EMG recordings blinding its visibility, which complies with the absence of significant cross-correlation ( Figure 2H).…”
Section: Effects Of Surface-electrode Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Surface electrodes have usually higher electrode impedances, which is usually accompanied by increased noise levels (Grimnes, 1983). Electrode impedance and background noise also depend on the electrode types (adhesive gel or dry surface electrodes), the electrode contact surface size, and conditions at the skin, such as the presence of perspiration (Grimnes, 1983;Godin et al, 1991;Huigen et al, 2002;Roy et al, 2007;Piervirgili et al, 2014;Merletti et al, 2016). Figure 2G shows the devastating effects of pronounced surface-electrode noise on continuous EMG recordings blinding its visibility, which complies with the absence of significant cross-correlation ( Figure 2H).…”
Section: Effects Of Surface-electrode Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be ascribed to a good adaptation of the electrolyte interface between electrode and skin in combination with the larger contact surface of the electrodes. Larger contact surfaces imply lower impedances (Geddes, 1972;Merletti et al, 2016). The contact surface of a disk electrode, Ø 10 mm, is about fivefold that of the contact surface of a needle electrode of length 12 mm, Ø 0.4 mm.…”
Section: Effects Of Surface-electrode Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 shows the latest version of our sEMG front-end, which has been obtained as result of our strengthened knowl- edge in bio-electronic acquisition field over years. The frontend works with the typical bipolar electrodes configuration [2], i.e., using two sensing electrodes to sense myofibers depolarization (V E1 1 and V E2 ) and one to refer body potential w.r.t. acquisition device (V ER ) [58].…”
Section: Front-end For Semg Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From its first clinical use in 1966 until now, the surface Elec-troMyoGraphy (sEMG) technique still maintains its essential place in the list of medical procedures to investigate the health of the human body. Indeed, by placing bio-potential electrodes directly on skin surface, sEMG provides an accessible way to monitor the electrical activity of skeletal muscles [1], [2]. During the last 30 years, beyond the constant evolution of sEMG in clinical applications [3]- [5], its practice also branches, reaching different non-medical sectors [6], e.g., fitness monitoring [7], (therapeutic) gaming control [8], virtual reality interaction [9], human-machine interface [10], [11], speech [12] and gesture [13], [14] recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%