2018
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2018.2830745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Geolocation of P-Band Radio Frequency Interference Using EcoSAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rosenberg et al proposed constrained fast-time space time adaptive processing (STAP) techniques which exploit adaptive beamforming to suppress the interference with minimal distortion to the final image [64][65][66]. Bollian et al proposed using digital beamforming techniques for the 32-channel EcoSAR system [67][68][69].…”
Section: Spatial Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosenberg et al proposed constrained fast-time space time adaptive processing (STAP) techniques which exploit adaptive beamforming to suppress the interference with minimal distortion to the final image [64][65][66]. Bollian et al proposed using digital beamforming techniques for the 32-channel EcoSAR system [67][68][69].…”
Section: Spatial Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the processed bandwidth only three peaks can be made out in the HH and five peaks in the VH image. Note that AoA estimations on the EcoSAR data can be found in Reference [57]. The dual-track mode of EcoSAR doubles the covered swath, though this makes it necessary to reserve notches for ambiguity suppression to suppress signals from the opposite side.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the angular resolution on the estimation gap length is then calculated by inserting ∆θ DBF into Eq. (11). The sweeping velocity is computed via [45]:…”
Section: A the Impact Of The Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a study by MacDonald Dettwiler Associates found an average backscatter increase of 3 dB from 1996 to 2012 over Ottawa, Canada, likely caused by RFI [4]. Many other SAR systems have reported interferences across P-, L-, and C-band [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. This trend is expected to continue [12], [13] because frequency bands assigned to spaceborne SAR are shared with other services [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%