2020
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8010125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Identification of Bacillus anthracis: From Conventional to Molecular Microbiology Methods

Abstract: Rapid and reliable identification of Bacillus anthracis is of great importance, especially in the event of suspected deliberate release of anthrax spores. However, the identification of B. anthracis is challenging due to its high similarity to closely related species. Since Amerithrax in 2001, a lot of effort has been made to develop rapid methods for detection and identification of this microorganism with special focus on easy-to-perform rapid tests for first-line responders. This article presents an overview… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The confirmatory specific identification of B. anthracis is often achieved by means of antigen–antibody interaction, be it in the form of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [ 38 ], lateral flow assays [ 39 , 40 ] or by the use of fluorescently labeled antibodies in microscopy [ 41 ] (further alternative detection techniques for B. anthracis are reviewed in a contribution to the special issue “An Update on Anthrax” of Microorganisms [ 42 ]). The direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) assay [ 41 ] may be seen as being related to the study at hand insofar as both methods take advantage of fluorescence reporters for detecting presumptive B. anthracis cultures and thus helping confirming the identity of this notorious biothreat agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confirmatory specific identification of B. anthracis is often achieved by means of antigen–antibody interaction, be it in the form of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [ 38 ], lateral flow assays [ 39 , 40 ] or by the use of fluorescently labeled antibodies in microscopy [ 41 ] (further alternative detection techniques for B. anthracis are reviewed in a contribution to the special issue “An Update on Anthrax” of Microorganisms [ 42 ]). The direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) assay [ 41 ] may be seen as being related to the study at hand insofar as both methods take advantage of fluorescence reporters for detecting presumptive B. anthracis cultures and thus helping confirming the identity of this notorious biothreat agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conserved regions within the 16S rRNA gene of the microbes’ DNA are usually utilized, which enhance sequence comparison. These provide an essential tool for the study evolutionary phylogenetic and molecular diversity [ 55 ]. Therefore, the antagonists isolates were subjected to molecular analysis for identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another paper describes an agar plate medium, named PLET, which contains the following ingredients added to Difco Heart Infusion Agar (HIA): polymyxin, lysozyme, disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate, (EDTA), and thallous [ 57 ]. These plates seem to be superior to other plates for the isolation of B. anthracis from other spore-forming bacilli [ 58 ]. There are some limitations for this medium such as stricter safety and environmental regulations due to the presence of thallium acetate [ 59 ], the ability of other Bacillus strains to grow on the PLET agar [ 60 ], and the reduction in the germination of B. anthracis spores on this media [ 61 ].…”
Section: Bacterial Bioterror Agents— B Anthracis Y Pestis and F Tularensismentioning
confidence: 99%