2005
DOI: 10.1292/jvms.67.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Isolation of Winter Dysentery Bovine Coronavirus Circulat in Korea during 2002-2004

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Although winter dysentery (WD) has been suspected to occur frequently in Korea, to date the exact epidemiology of WD has remained unknown. Therefore, we investigated the causative agents of WD by using electron microscopy, ELISA, RT-PCR, and nested PCR from 97 fecal samples of 32 WD-affected herds collected from 8 provinces during [2002][2003][2004]. The bovine coronavirus (BoCV) was consistently detected in all herds with WD. Of other pathogens, only coccidian oocyts were inconsistently but concurre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in other cases, isolates of BoCV with >98% phylogenetic similarity have been identified in enteric and respiratory disease and an isolate of BCoV from a case of winter dysentery demonstrated both respiratory and enteric tropism after experimental infection . Phylogenetic differences between BCoV isolates from different geographical locations are greater than the differences between isolates from different clinical syndromes . Further characterisation of BCoV isolates from Australian cattle is required and the potential for variation in the genome sequence needs to be considered when interpreting qRT‐PCR assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in other cases, isolates of BoCV with >98% phylogenetic similarity have been identified in enteric and respiratory disease and an isolate of BCoV from a case of winter dysentery demonstrated both respiratory and enteric tropism after experimental infection . Phylogenetic differences between BCoV isolates from different geographical locations are greater than the differences between isolates from different clinical syndromes . Further characterisation of BCoV isolates from Australian cattle is required and the potential for variation in the genome sequence needs to be considered when interpreting qRT‐PCR assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequence of the S2 subunit is more conserved and this subunit is responsible for cell membrane fusion activity (Yoo et al, 1991). The S1 gene has been exploited as a target to study the molecular epidemiology of BCoV infection (Hasoksuz et al, 2002a;Jeong et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten WD strains, KWD1-KWD10, were originally isolated in the G clone of human rectal tumor cells (HRT-18G) from fecal samples of adult dairy or beef cows, with WD in South Korea, and identified as a BCoV by immunoelectron microscopy, ELISA with BCoV-specific antisera and monoclonal antibodies, and RT-PCR specific for the part of BCoV N gene (Jeong et al, 2004). RNA was extracted from the supernatant fluids of HRT-18G cells infected with 10 KWD strains, based on the acid quanidinium-phenol-chloroform RNA extraction method as described by Cho et al (2001a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%