2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2016/11/113302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and localization of change points in temporal networks with the aid of stochastic block models

Abstract: Abstract.A framework based on generalized hierarchical random graphs (GHRGs) for the detection of change points in the structure of temporal networks has recently been developed by Peel and Clauset (2015 Proc. 29th AAAI Conf. on Artificial Intelligence). We build on this methodology and extend it to also include the versatile stochastic block models (SBMs) as a parametric family for reconstructing the empirical networks. We use five dierent techniques for change point detection on prototypical temporal netwo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing results on change-point detection for the case when the data sequence takes values in a general metric space are quite limited. Parametric approaches exist for change detection in a sequence of networks (De Ridder, Vandermarliere and Ryckebusch, 2016;Peel and Clauset, 2015;Wang, Yu and Rinaldo, 2018). These approaches have been developed for special cases and are not applicable more generally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing results on change-point detection for the case when the data sequence takes values in a general metric space are quite limited. Parametric approaches exist for change detection in a sequence of networks (De Ridder, Vandermarliere and Ryckebusch, 2016;Peel and Clauset, 2015;Wang, Yu and Rinaldo, 2018). These approaches have been developed for special cases and are not applicable more generally.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of most important features of the proposed method is detecting changes in meso-scopic network properties, grouping of nodes, such as homophilous or heterophilous groups and core-periphery substructures in a network. The emergence (and changes) of group structures is commonly observed in realworld network data (Borgatti and Everett, 1999;Nowicki and Snijders, 2001;Newman, 2006;Fortunato, 2010;Xu, 2015;Ridder et al, 2016). The formulation of MTRM in Equation (4), however, is designed to recover consistent regression parameters (β) considering network effects as a nuisance parameter.…”
Section: Degree Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation of our method is firmly based on a common observation in network analysis that longitudinal network datasets frequently exhibit irregular dynamics, implying multiple changes in their data generating processes (e.g. Guo et al, 2007;Heard et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2014;Cribben and Yu, 2016;Barnett and Onnela, 2016;Ridder et al, 2016). Figure 1 shows an example of longitudinal network data with 3 layers of time series and 90 nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most approaches, however, rely on a characteristic time scale on which they describe the dynamics. These can be divided, roughly, into approaches that model temporal correlations via Markov chains relating short-time memory with future behavior [12,13], and those that model the dynamics at longer times, usually via network snapshots [14][15][16][17][18][19] or discrete change points [20][21][22]. In reality, however, most systems exhibit both kinds of dynamics, and focusing on a single aspect comes at the expense of ignoring the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%