2022
DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2022.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Management of Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease Treated with Anti-Amyloid Beta Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
103
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact mechanisms of ARIA-E remain to be fully elucidated. The review of lessons learned from the last decade of research confirmed the ARIA Paradox as the most accredited pathophysiologic model to explain the biological complexity of ARIA-E. 1 , 4 , 5 , 10 , 12 , 42 According to this model, ARIA-E is a complex and multifactorial phenomenon resulting from the imbalance between the removal of Aβ deposited in plaques, which is attributed to the dose, time, and type of anti-Aβ (auto)antibodies, and the downstream effects that an excessive mobilization of Aβ can cause on intramural periarterial drainage pathways, 43 which may account for increased transient CAA, cerebrovascular impairment, greater vascular permeability, and an easier extravasation of proteinaceous fluid and VE, particularly in ApoE ε4 carriers. 1 , 2 , 10 , 12 , 44 46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The exact mechanisms of ARIA-E remain to be fully elucidated. The review of lessons learned from the last decade of research confirmed the ARIA Paradox as the most accredited pathophysiologic model to explain the biological complexity of ARIA-E. 1 , 4 , 5 , 10 , 12 , 42 According to this model, ARIA-E is a complex and multifactorial phenomenon resulting from the imbalance between the removal of Aβ deposited in plaques, which is attributed to the dose, time, and type of anti-Aβ (auto)antibodies, and the downstream effects that an excessive mobilization of Aβ can cause on intramural periarterial drainage pathways, 43 which may account for increased transient CAA, cerebrovascular impairment, greater vascular permeability, and an easier extravasation of proteinaceous fluid and VE, particularly in ApoE ε4 carriers. 1 , 2 , 10 , 12 , 44 46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The exact mechanisms of ARIA-E remain to be fully elucidated. The review of lessons learned from the last decade of research confirmed the ARIA Paradox as the most accredited pathophysiological model to explain the biological complexity of ARIA-E. 1,4,10,12,23,43 According to this model, ARIA-E is a complex and multifactorial phenomenon resulting from the imbalance between the removal of Aβ deposited in plaques, which is attributed to the dose, time, and type of anti-Aβ (auto)antibodies, and the downstream effects that an excessive mobilization of Aβ can cause on intramural periarterial drainage pathways, 44 , which may account for increased transient CAA, cerebrovascular impairment, greater vascular permeability, and an easier extravasation of proteinaceous fluid and VE, particularly in ApoE ε4 carriers. 1,2,10,12,[45][46][47] In this proof of principle study, we extend the understanding of ARIA-E biology by providing the first in vivo evidence for an association between ARIA-E and microglial activation through multimodal and multiparametric MRI, CSF testing for anti-Aβ autoantibodies and AT(N) biomarkers, and 11 C-PK11195-PET longitudinal assessments in patients with CAA-ri, a spontaneous human model of the iatrogenic ARIA-E of AD immunotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both active and passive immunizations are being explored and are at different stages of clinical trials [ 3 ]. The recent approval of aducanumab is under debate in the scientific community and the improvement in cognition was statistically significant in only a subset of patients who received the highest dose of aducanumab, a fully human IgG1 anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds plaque amyloid [ 4 ], while a subset of patients developed Amyloid related Imaging abnormalities (ARIA) with mostly transient and asymptomatic vasogenic edema and/or microhemorrhages [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Although controversial, the aducanumab clinical trials demonstrated that higher antibody exposure was associated with better biomarker changes and clinical outcomes [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The presence of pretreatment hemosiderin products most consistent with CAA, lobar microhemorrhages and superficial siderosis, is a serious imaging risk factor predictive of ARIA with the use of anti-amyloid mAb therapies, particularly in APOE-e4 carriers. 39,40 Due to the increased risk of adverse events in homozygous APOE-e4 carriers, APOE-e4 testing could be considered before drug initiation and could be used to help determine the frequency of safety monitoring examinations in future, updated treatment guidelines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%