2012
DOI: 10.5047/eps.2012.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and mapping of soil liquefaction in the 2011 Tohoku earthquake using SAR interferometry

Abstract: We have identified areas of soil liquefaction by the analysis of surface changes caused by the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometry in the Kanto region of Japan. Changes in surface scattering properties were evaluated using phase-corrected coherence, computed from the reflective intensity (amplitude) of SAR data. Often, the loss of coherence (decorrelation) is simply considered to represent areas damaged from the disaster. However, temporal decorrelation could also be ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study thus demonstrates that it is feasible to combine and extend the advantages of two different remote sensing sensors for earthquake damage assessments. The urban damage levels following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake were obtained from the degree of interferometric coherence of pre-seismic and co-seismic data, and the findings were consistent with the results of previous research reports that mapped the urban damage [11][12][13]15] and liquefaction areas [27] by using interferometric coherence.…”
Section: Overall Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study thus demonstrates that it is feasible to combine and extend the advantages of two different remote sensing sensors for earthquake damage assessments. The urban damage levels following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake were obtained from the degree of interferometric coherence of pre-seismic and co-seismic data, and the findings were consistent with the results of previous research reports that mapped the urban damage [11][12][13]15] and liquefaction areas [27] by using interferometric coherence.…”
Section: Overall Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To clarify the change of correlation between damaged areas and low coherence areas such as forests, plantations, and reservoirs, comparisons of pre-disaster and co-disaster interferogram correlations were used to evaluate the change caused by the Kumamoto earthquake. We evaluated buildings damaged by the earthquake [10][11][12] and detected areas of soil liquefaction [27]. The normalized difference (ND) of the coherence change (Equation (2)) was also used to detect damaged areas [9,13]:…”
Section: Interferometric Sar Coherence Change For the Earthquake Damamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that liquefaction induces ground subsidence and can be sometimes detected by InSAR (Ishitsuka et al 2012). Liquefaction occurred in some parts of Mashiki town during the earthquake series, yet the timing of liquefaction does not appear to be known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the coherence difference method presented by (Ishitsuka, Tsuji, & Matsuoka, 2012) and (Tamura & Li, 2013). The main idea of this approach is to identify the pixels that lost coherence as a result of a certain event.…”
Section: Soil Liquefaction Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%