2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and molecular characterization of enteric viruses in children with acute gastroenteritis in Northern Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
41
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
11
41
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This disparity amongst studies may be due to the number of viruses analyzed, viral detection methods, season of sampling, and sample size. The most common coinfections were between RVA and HAstV which is in contrast with reports of Biscaro et al, Ferreira et al, and Ouédraogo et al who had RVA and HAdV as the most prevalent. Pang and Vesikari previously reported the rate of HAstV and RVA coinfections among gastroenteritis in children to be extremely low (10 of 1528 or 0.006%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This disparity amongst studies may be due to the number of viruses analyzed, viral detection methods, season of sampling, and sample size. The most common coinfections were between RVA and HAstV which is in contrast with reports of Biscaro et al, Ferreira et al, and Ouédraogo et al who had RVA and HAdV as the most prevalent. Pang and Vesikari previously reported the rate of HAstV and RVA coinfections among gastroenteritis in children to be extremely low (10 of 1528 or 0.006%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively low frequency of coinfection (9.7%) was observed in this study, which is lower than previously reported in Burkina Faso (35.7%) and Brazil (14%), but higher compared with studies from China (5.2%), Northern Italy (2.3%), and Nigeria (7.1%) . This disparity amongst studies may be due to the number of viruses analyzed, viral detection methods, season of sampling, and sample size.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations