2005
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Preliminary Analysis of Motifs in Promoters of Anaerobically Induced Genes of Different Plant Species

Abstract: It is believed that the promoter motifs identified could be functional by conferring anaerobic sensitivity to the genes that possess them. This proposal now requires experimental verification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The in silico analysis reveals that the CPS promoter could play a role in such processes as response to ethylene, dark, light, auxin, and salicylic acid, but these results have not yet been validated experimentally in S. miltiorrhiza [29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Also, the potential influence of such stress factors as anaerobic conditions, dehydration, pathogen infection, and protein unfolding on CPS expression should be verified and validated experimentally [40][41][42][43]. Comparison of results obtained by the in silico search to the outcome of microarray data, indicated no shared, co-regulated proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The in silico analysis reveals that the CPS promoter could play a role in such processes as response to ethylene, dark, light, auxin, and salicylic acid, but these results have not yet been validated experimentally in S. miltiorrhiza [29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Also, the potential influence of such stress factors as anaerobic conditions, dehydration, pathogen infection, and protein unfolding on CPS expression should be verified and validated experimentally [40][41][42][43]. Comparison of results obtained by the in silico search to the outcome of microarray data, indicated no shared, co-regulated proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 indicated that S. miltiorrhiza CPS promoter activity could be controlled through the numerous stress factors occurring in the internal and external environment of the plant as anaerobic conditions, pathogen infection, dehydration, and protein unfolding [40][41][42][43]. …”
Section: The Structure Of Cps Promoter and 5'utr Of Cps Genementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evolutionary fate of rhizome-specific genes anaerobic genes (AAACAAA; Mohanty et al, 2005) showed significantly higher abundance in S. bicolor than the other species. The promoters of S. bicolor genes were enriched relative to those of O. sativa for three additional cis-elements, À300 element (Thomas and Flavell, 1990), À10 promoter element (Thum et al, 2001) and TATA box (Grace et al, 2004).…”
Section: Evolutionary Fate Of Rhizome-specific Genesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These include glycolytic and fermentation enzymes and other metabolic proteins as well as various signal transduction proteins, transcription factors, and other genes involved in the adaptation response to anaerobiosis (Klok et al, 2002;Branco-Price et al, 2008;Mustroph et al, 2009Mustroph et al, , 2010. These regulatory controls rely on cis-acting hypoxia regulatory elements in the promoters of hypoxia-responsive genes (Dolferus et al, 2001;Mohanty et al, 2005), posttranscriptional control by silencing RNAs (Moldovan et al, 2010;Licausi et al, 2011), mRNA sequestration in ribonucleoprotein complexes (Weber et al, 2008;Sorenson and Bailey-Serres, 2014), and the selective targeting of core hypoxia-response transcripts to polysomes (Branco-Price et al, 2008;Mustroph et al, 2009). Overall, these developmental programs prepare the plant at various fronts for a coordinated survival response to low oxygen stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%