2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and quantification of adulteration of sesame oils with vegetable oils using gas chromatography and multivariate data analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final dataset tested was a combination of the two datasets previously mentioned, resulting in five classes; CPRO, RRO, RSO, CPRO:RRO, and CPRO:RSO. Ternary oil mixtures were not investigated because classification accuracy decreases with an increasing number of adulterants and in fact, binary adulteration is a more common form of adulteration. As a result of the increased class number in this scenario, the accuracy of the models decreased, compared with the previous three class datasets (scenario 1 and 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final dataset tested was a combination of the two datasets previously mentioned, resulting in five classes; CPRO, RRO, RSO, CPRO:RRO, and CPRO:RSO. Ternary oil mixtures were not investigated because classification accuracy decreases with an increasing number of adulterants and in fact, binary adulteration is a more common form of adulteration. As a result of the increased class number in this scenario, the accuracy of the models decreased, compared with the previous three class datasets (scenario 1 and 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, several nonseparation/nondestructive techniques (e.g., isotope ratio mass spectrometry, infrared spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy) have been applied for the detection of adulterated sesame oils [1,4,6]. Previous studies have also employed techniques such as gas chromatography (GC) coupled with a flame ionization detector [7] or mass spectrometer [8,9], high performance liquid chromatography with a refractive index detector [10], an evaporative light scattering detector [5,11] or a fluorescence detector [12], an electronic nose [13], and realtime PCR [14]. Despite the recent advances in the analytical 2 Journal of Chemistry methods available for the detection of sesame oil adulteration, the minimum adulteration detection levels remain relatively high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of methods based on spectral technology (Wu, Wu, Sun, & Li, 2014), hyper-spectral imaging (HSI) (Bauer, Stefan, & Le on, 2015;Huang, Zhao, Wang, & Zhu, 2015) has gained increasing attention for rapid detection of anomalies on food products in recent years such as for quality inspection of onions (Wang, 2015), revealing food adulteration with independent components analysis (Puneet et al, 2016), detection of cold injury in peaches by artificial neural network (Pan et al, 2016), visualizing moisture distribution of mango slices during microwavevacuum drying (Pu & Sun, 2015), and discrimination of rice varieties using LS-SVM classification algorithms . Compared to the traditional methods (Zhu, Shen, Chen, Yang, & Hou, 2015) (Gas Chromatography, GC; Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometer, GC-MS; Liquid Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer, LC-MS; High Performance Liquid Chromatography, HPLC, et al) for chemical detection of pesticide residues, HSI is a rapid, accurate and nondestructive method (Han, Zeng, Lu, & Zhang, 2015;Julio Cesare & Jairo Arturo, 2015;Peng et al, 2015;Xu, Hu, Wang, Wan, & Bao, 2015). Although traditional methods have high accuracy, the detection process is more complex, which belongs to the damage detection being conducive to be promoted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%