2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1821-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and quantification of mitochondrial DNA deletions from next-generation sequence data

Abstract: BackgroundChromosomal deletions represent an important class of human genetic variation. Various methods have been developed to mine “next-generation” sequencing (NGS) data to detect deletions and quantify their clonal abundances. These methods have focused almost exclusively on the nuclear genome, ignoring the mitochondrial chromosome (mtDNA). Detecting mtDNA deletions requires special care. First, the chromosome’s relatively small size (16,569 bp) necessitates the ability to detect extremely focal events. Se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The functional effect of the variants were predicted using open-source algorithms including PolyPhen-2 131 , PANTHER 132 , Envision 133 , MutationAssessor 134 , MutPred2 135 and SNPs&GO 136 . The mtDNA deletion was also determined via MitoDel 137 and eKLIPse 138 . MitoDel is a tool for detecting and quantifying mtDNA deletions even at low heteroplasmy levels via the BLAT split read mapping method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional effect of the variants were predicted using open-source algorithms including PolyPhen-2 131 , PANTHER 132 , Envision 133 , MutationAssessor 134 , MutPred2 135 and SNPs&GO 136 . The mtDNA deletion was also determined via MitoDel 137 and eKLIPse 138 . MitoDel is a tool for detecting and quantifying mtDNA deletions even at low heteroplasmy levels via the BLAT split read mapping method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also tested a mtDNA deletion detection tool (MitoDel) in conjunction with two RNA-Seq alignment methods (MapSplice and STAR), as well as with the suggested DNA aligner (BWA), and compared these results to the sensitivities described above for our Splice-Break pipeline (31,34,36–38). Our assessment of the ‘common deletion’ demonstrated a robust effect of alignment method, with the poorest detection sensitivity (3–4%) resulting from MitoDel after BWA alignment (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details about our rationale to use an RNA-Seq tool can be found in the online Supplemental Methods. We compared our process to an alternative mtDNA deletion detection method (MitoDel (31)) in addition to several alignment algorithms- MapSplice (34), TopHat (36), STAR (37) and BWA (38). The details of these comparisons can be found in the Results and online Supplemental Methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations