2009
DOI: 10.1310/sci1404-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Treatment of Sublesional Osteoporosis Among Patients with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, we are aware of some 25 reviews that have discussed these topics to some degree in the past decade (for comprehensive reviews see: [3,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]). Despite the fact that bone loss after SCI is a well-established and highly discussed phenomenon, little progress has been made to reduce bone loss and the incidence of fracture observed after SCI, especially when compared to advancements made in postmenopausal and age-related osteoporosis [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, we are aware of some 25 reviews that have discussed these topics to some degree in the past decade (for comprehensive reviews see: [3,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]). Despite the fact that bone loss after SCI is a well-established and highly discussed phenomenon, little progress has been made to reduce bone loss and the incidence of fracture observed after SCI, especially when compared to advancements made in postmenopausal and age-related osteoporosis [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, the available evidence supports that the best use of knee software in clinical investigations is to monitor potential changes from mechanical and/or pharmacological interventions. Along with SCI-specific clinical risk factors [53], this information can guide clinical treatment options and/or research interventions associated with the application of substantial mechanical forces during supervised therapeutic sessions or exercise training routines. Because of the scarcity of literature that defines a given DXA-derived aBMD value, as well as the absence of a well-validated fracture threshold at the DF and PT, clinicians should consider collecting, if feasible, additional trabecular microarchitecture and bone geometry measures from CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to better identify persons who are at heightened risk of fragility fracture.…”
Section: Dxa Software For the Knee Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review of proposed paradigms to diagnose and treat sublesional osteoporosis, Craven et al [53] summarized the risk factors associated with fragility fracture based on the available literature as follows: SCI occurred <16 years of age [77], paraplegia [78], excessive alcohol consumption after SCI (>5 servings per day) [9], completeness of injury (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A and B) [11], family history of fragility fracture [76], female [30], previous fragility fracture [30], low BMI (<19 kg/m 2 ) [79], and duration of injury ≥10 years [30]. While it is true that larger prospective cohort studies are needed to identify the extent to which these risk factors are independent of aBMD, physicians and therapists should utilize these SCI-specific clinical risk factors along with aBMD of the DF and PT to guide treatment throughout the chronic phase of injury.…”
Section: Low Bmd and Fragility Fracture In Scimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragility fractures result from low force injuries insufficient to fracture normal bone. 39,40 Common etiologies of fragility fractures after SCI include leg torsion during transfers or rolling in bed, or falling to the floor from a wheelchair or commode on a flexed knee. Compression fractures of vertebral bodies should be considered as fragility fractures, in the absence of reported trauma.…”
Section: Fracture(s) Since the Spinal Cord Lesionmentioning
confidence: 99%