2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c06537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection Methods for Foodborne Viruses: Current State-of-Art and Future Perspectives

Abstract: Foodborne viruses have been recognized as important threats to food safety and human health. Rapid and accurate detection is one of the most crucial measures for food safety control. With the development of biology, chemistry, nanoscience, and related interdisciplines, detection strategies have been devised and advanced continuously. This review mainly focuses on the progress of detection methods for foodborne viruses. The current detection methods for foodborne viruses are summarized, including traditional el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very recently, Yin et al discussed the current state-of-art and future perspectives of detection methods for foodborne viruses. 317 Other recent review articles that include microfluidic devices have been worked out, for instance by Gao et al , who discussed advances in microfluidic devices for foodborne pathogen detection, 318 by Shang et al with focus on advances in nanomaterial-based microfluidic platforms, 319 by Ranjbaran et al on microfluidics at the interface of bacteria and fresh produce, 320 or by Quintela et al on advances and limitations of portable and rapid detection technologies for foodborne pathogens. 321 Mi et al summarized microfluidic biosensor tools for foodborne pathogenic bacteria and Su et al investigated microfluidic nucleic acid tests of foodborne viruses.…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Tract Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, Yin et al discussed the current state-of-art and future perspectives of detection methods for foodborne viruses. 317 Other recent review articles that include microfluidic devices have been worked out, for instance by Gao et al , who discussed advances in microfluidic devices for foodborne pathogen detection, 318 by Shang et al with focus on advances in nanomaterial-based microfluidic platforms, 319 by Ranjbaran et al on microfluidics at the interface of bacteria and fresh produce, 320 or by Quintela et al on advances and limitations of portable and rapid detection technologies for foodborne pathogens. 321 Mi et al summarized microfluidic biosensor tools for foodborne pathogenic bacteria and Su et al investigated microfluidic nucleic acid tests of foodborne viruses.…”
Section: Gastrointestinal Tract Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing biosensors and microfluidics technology has significantly accelerated the development of health monitoring systems by enabling rapid detection methods. Microfluidic technology allows the incorporation of intricate analytical procedures into minute volumes, including but not limited to temperature regulation, sampling, combining, separation, enrichment, and cleansing [228][229][230]. Regarding the early detection of CCHFV infection, novel diagnostic approaches based on biosensors and nano biosensors have received scant consideration.…”
Section: Table 4 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These drawbacks would interfere with the detection results to cause false positives and negatives. Besides, the preamplification step may have an adverse influence on the subsequent reaction steps . In addition, the participation of enzymes increases the cost.…”
Section: Disadvantages Of Amplification For Crispr-dxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the preamplification step may have an adverse influence on the subsequent reaction steps. 29 In addition, the participation of enzymes increases the cost. The preservation of enzymes would be problematic as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%