2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of 1H-Triphosphirene (c-HP3) and 2-Triphosphenylidene (HP3): The Isovalent Counterparts of 1H-Triazirine (c-HN3) and Hydrazoic Acid (HN3)

Abstract: The hitherto elusive 1H-triphosphirene (c-HP3) and 2-triphosphenylidene (HP3) molecules were prepared in low-temperature matrices and detected isomer selectively through photoionization coupled with reflectron time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PI-ReTOF-MS). Our results reveal a thermodynamically preferred cyclic isomer (c-HP3) compared to the acyclic structure (HP3) in contrast to the isovalent HN3 system favoring hydrazoic acid (HN3) compared to 1H-triazirine (c-HN3). Theoretical computations suggest a ring s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the theoretical results that cyc -HPN 2 (Figure ) is less stable by 12.1 kcal mol –1 with an activation barrier of 26.6 kcal mol –1 (Figure S5), which is larger than the estimated barrier (15.1 kcal mol –1 , Figure S6) for the dissociation of HPN 2 to PH and N 2 . The energy difference (Δ E ) between the cyclic and acyclic HPN 2 isomers is right between those for HN 3 (Δ E = 39.2 kcal mol –1 ) and HP 3 (Δ E = −30.2 kcal mol –1 ) . Therefore, the stronger pyramidalization of phosphorus than nitrogen atom can stabilize the cyclic isomer by reducing the associated strain energy, as also evident from the triatomic molecule OPN, for which the cyclic isomer (Δ E = 22.4 kcal mol –1 ) is detectable, whereas cyc -N 2 O (Δ E = 64.8 kcal mol –1 ) remains yet putative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with the theoretical results that cyc -HPN 2 (Figure ) is less stable by 12.1 kcal mol –1 with an activation barrier of 26.6 kcal mol –1 (Figure S5), which is larger than the estimated barrier (15.1 kcal mol –1 , Figure S6) for the dissociation of HPN 2 to PH and N 2 . The energy difference (Δ E ) between the cyclic and acyclic HPN 2 isomers is right between those for HN 3 (Δ E = 39.2 kcal mol –1 ) and HP 3 (Δ E = −30.2 kcal mol –1 ) . Therefore, the stronger pyramidalization of phosphorus than nitrogen atom can stabilize the cyclic isomer by reducing the associated strain energy, as also evident from the triatomic molecule OPN, for which the cyclic isomer (Δ E = 22.4 kcal mol –1 ) is detectable, whereas cyc -N 2 O (Δ E = 64.8 kcal mol –1 ) remains yet putative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similar to the molecular structures of HPCO ( ∠ HPC = 86.8°) and HP 3 ( ∠ HPP = 89.7°), HPN 2 is bent as the ∠ HPN angle is 88.7°, which is much smaller than the ∠ HNN angle in HN 3 (109(5)°). The ∠ PNN angle (173.8°) is comparable to the ∠ NNN (172.8­(2)°) and ∠ PPP (169.7°) in HN 3 and HP 3 , respectively. The P–H bond (1.415 Å) is shorter than those in HPCO (1.427 Å) and HP 3 (1.427 Å).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations