1989
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780080312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of aberrations in the occurrence of notifiable diseases surveillance data

Abstract: The detection of unusual patterns in the occurrence of diseases and other health events presents an important challenge to public health surveillance. This paper discusses three analytic methods for identifying aberrations in underlying distributions. The methods are illustrated on selected infectious diseases included in the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System of the Centers for Disease Control. Results suggest the utility of such an analytic approach. Further work will determine the sensitivity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Aberration Detection: A standard aberration detection algorithm was used to calculate the running mean of historical cases for the time period 2006-2010 [27][28][29]. Current cases were grouped in 4 week intervals to be compared to five years of historical data for the same 4 week intervals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aberration Detection: A standard aberration detection algorithm was used to calculate the running mean of historical cases for the time period 2006-2010 [27][28][29]. Current cases were grouped in 4 week intervals to be compared to five years of historical data for the same 4 week intervals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting on 1 June 2009, the expected ILI incidence was calculated for each week as the average of weekly ILI incidences reported in the preceding, current and following weeks in the period 1985 to 2008 [4]. A 90% confidence interval was derived from the 5th and 95th percentiles of these values (Q 5 and Q 95 , respectively) for each week.…”
Section: Expected and Excess Ili Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le Straat (2005) [11] comprehensively reviews to that date the statistical methods that have been applied for detecting or monitoring outbreaks and monitoring trends of diseases. Some of them have been implemented in the R-package surveillance, in particular, those by Stroup et al (1989) [24], Farrington et al (1996) [2] and Höhle and Riebler (2005) [10]. The list of contributions in surveillance is still growing (see, for instance, recent papers by Held et al (2005Held et al ( , 2006 [8,9]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%