Detection of Abnormalities in COVID-19 Infected Human Respiratory System using Accelerometer with the aid of Machine Learning

Kiran, K. V. D.; Shakeela, Shaikh; Kalyan, D.; Madhu, Y.; Chaitanya, G. Sai; Reddy, G. Ekanath

doi:10.31838/ijpr/2020.12.04.464

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the five papers classified as Basic research, ThingsBoard is used either for comparison with other IoT platforms (Ismail et al, 2018;Held et al, 2022;Ottolini et al, 2022), to implement the theory presented in the study (Carratù et al, 2021), or to introduce a blockchain authentication scheme tailored for ThingsBoard (Jang et al, 2021). In the four papers classified as General purpose, ThingsBoard is used either to build an environment that provides automation with a security layer of Blockchain technology (Pal et al, 2023), to set up an IoT architecture suitable to implement generic IoT applications (Kiran et al, 2020), as the cloud IoT platform in the design and implementation of an opensource IoT-based SCADA system (Aghenta and Iqbal, 2019), or as cloud IoT platform for implementing a generic IoT monitoring system (Scott and Eleyan, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Papers Mentioning Things Board: A Systematic Mapping Study

Di Felice,

Paolone

2024

Journal of Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a previous article, we conducted a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) devoted to identifying the open-source IoT platform that nowadays offers the most features as well as adequate documentation and which, therefore, is a useful middleware in the development of IoT applications. In light of the final findings of such a study, ThingsBoard was selected. The present paper reports on the findings of a subsequent mapping study. We queried the Scopus database looking for articles that mention ThingsBoard either in the Title, in the Abstract, or among the authors' Keywords. 55 items were retrieved and carefully read. At the end of this stage, we were able to answer the following research questions: Are there available studies mentioning ThingsBoard? In which ambits? What is the role of ThingsBoard in the studies where it is mentioned? What are the gaps in current research and the implications for future research? The study goals are general, so the final findings might be of interest to IoT professionals, as well as to scholars. In detail, the SMS provides insights into the breadth of usage and the domains where ThingsBoard has been applied successfully, indicating its suitability and potential for a wide range of IoT-related projects. Moreover, a few gaps to be filled with further research have emerged.

show abstract