2020 8th International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ieecon48109.2020.229558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Account Cloning in Online Social Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The precision of fake accounts was 0.8, and real accounts was 0.92, so the approach was proved good after about 50 iterations. Punkamol and Marukatat [24] proposed a method that identified account cloning in Twitter based on user profiles, friends, "follower networks," and posting behaviors. "Twitter Crawler, Attribute Extractor, and Cloning Detector" were parts of the framework.…”
Section: Role Of Machine Learning In Fake Profile Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of fake accounts was 0.8, and real accounts was 0.92, so the approach was proved good after about 50 iterations. Punkamol and Marukatat [24] proposed a method that identified account cloning in Twitter based on user profiles, friends, "follower networks," and posting behaviors. "Twitter Crawler, Attribute Extractor, and Cloning Detector" were parts of the framework.…”
Section: Role Of Machine Learning In Fake Profile Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in case the extracted profile was fake, the photo of this profile has already satisfied the similarity threshold of the face recognition module. Thus, this means that this kind of profile is a clone of a real user profile since it would have both the same data and a photo of the real person that SODA was looking for [34,35].…”
Section: A Tool For Analyzing User Datamentioning
confidence: 99%