2009 2nd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cisp.2009.5301705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of an Unknown Frequency Hopping Signal Based on Image Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(a). In order to represent the signal in a more plausible way, we adopt a widely used morphological dilation and erosion processes from the domain of image processing [12,13] to recover the received signal properly. A signal with impairments and the output of dilation and erosion processes are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(a). In order to represent the signal in a more plausible way, we adopt a widely used morphological dilation and erosion processes from the domain of image processing [12,13] to recover the received signal properly. A signal with impairments and the output of dilation and erosion processes are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-cooperative detection of the FHSS signal is the first step of the entire signal interception procedure [2]. Although various methods has been rendered since the 1990s (e.g., methods based on time-frequency analysis [3][4][5][6][7][8], wavelet analysis [4,[9][10][11][12][13], auto-correlation analysis [9,[14][15][16], likelihood analysis [17][18][19][20][21], etc. ), energy thresholding is the most commonly used in FHSS signal detection [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%