2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of antibodies against flavivirus over time in wild non-human primates from the lowlands of Costa Rica

Abstract: Two-hundred-nine free ranging non-human primates from 31 locations throughout Costa Rica were captured and released between 1993 and 2012, and blood samples, sera or plasma were collected, to detect antigens and antibodies, and so assess the distribution of active and passive flavivirus infections over time. A competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay for the detection of antibodies was used to determine the distribution of past flavivirus infections over time, while Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was significant intra-group heterogeneity in the serology group (I 2 : 97.82%), and pooling of results from both serology and RT-PCR methods was not supported as given significant inter-group heterogeneity was noted ( p = 0.000). There were 15 studies involving a forest setting [ 22 , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] ], 12 of which were based solely in a forest. Of 7 studies involving the urban/rural setting [ 26 , 31 , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] ], only 5 were exclusively based at such.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was significant intra-group heterogeneity in the serology group (I 2 : 97.82%), and pooling of results from both serology and RT-PCR methods was not supported as given significant inter-group heterogeneity was noted ( p = 0.000). There were 15 studies involving a forest setting [ 22 , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] ], 12 of which were based solely in a forest. Of 7 studies involving the urban/rural setting [ 26 , 31 , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] ], only 5 were exclusively based at such.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… [ 31 ] Argentina Unknown Unknown 0/4 NHP, Monkeys Costa Rica 31 Lowlands locations Forest & Urban/rural (Private land) 1993–1996, 2000–2012 8/155 (5.2); D2,3,4 (C/prM) 53/209 (25.4) (Tested against flavivirus) ELISA Co-circulation of D1,2,3,4 since re-emergence in 1993. [ 26 ] NHP, Monkeys Malaysia Unknown Forest 1962–1964 139/221 (62.9); D2 PRNT; Tested for D2 only [ 35 ] NHP, Monkeys French Guiana Petit Saut Hydroelectric Dam Forest 1994–1995 0/145 PRNT; Tested for D2 only Dramatic increase in cases over the past 30 years, epidemic in 1991–1992 with up to 3000 cases. [ 37 ] Mandrill Gabon Lope National Park Forest 1998–2006 2/25 (8); D2 PRNT; Tested for D2 only [ 30 ] NHP, Monkeys Congo Basin; Uganda, Democratic Republic of Congo & Rwanda Bwindi forest, Park National of the Volcanoes, Kinigi & Unknown locations Forest 2001–2009 0/44 NHP, Monkeys Panama Localities near the Canal zone (unknown setting) Urban/rural 1954–1955 2/105 (1.9); D1,2 HI; Tested against D1/2 only (Only 2 positive samples further tested using PRNT) Dengue epidemic in 1904, 1912, late 1941 to early 1942.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, spillback cases with primates acting as reservoirs for urban dengue serotypes could also occur [ 116 ], and this might be happening in South America [ 33 , 34 ]. Seropositivity to the dengue virus has been documented in species from the genus Alouatta in north-eastern Argentina [ 117 ] and Costa Rica [ 118 ], from Cebus in Costa Rica [ 118 ], and from Leontopithecus in south-eastern Brazil [ 119 ]. Precisely, south-eastern Brazil, specifically the Atlantic forests surrounding Bahia, is highlighted by our model as an area at risk of zoonotic transmission to humans ( Fig 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZIKV and DENV circulate in anthroponotic cycles, which has facilitated their rapid spread throughout the Americas [10], with no recognized sylvatic cycle. Nevertheless, possible maintenance through sylvatic cycles has been suggested in the Americas for NPs of different species, i.e., Alouatta spp., Cebus spp., Ateles spp., by serological and molecular detections [11][12][13]. However, these detections may be due to spillback, i.e., humans being the primary source of the virus and spilling the virus into wildlife [7,11,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%