2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of antimicrobial residues in animal manure by a microbiological screening methodology: A non-invasive tool in animal production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the increase of CAP-contaminated food and the environment, detection methods give rise to attention. The traditional detection methods of CAP include microbiological assay, 7 immunoassay, [8][9][10] and standard techniques, such as High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), 9,11,12 LC-MS, 13,14 and GC-MS. 15 The first two methods cannot achieve quantitative detection and are prone to false positives. 7 The traditional detection methods are reliable for the analysis of CAP but still are restricted for most instruments expensive and demand laboratory setup, professional operation, and high operating costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the increase of CAP-contaminated food and the environment, detection methods give rise to attention. The traditional detection methods of CAP include microbiological assay, 7 immunoassay, [8][9][10] and standard techniques, such as High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), 9,11,12 LC-MS, 13,14 and GC-MS. 15 The first two methods cannot achieve quantitative detection and are prone to false positives. 7 The traditional detection methods are reliable for the analysis of CAP but still are restricted for most instruments expensive and demand laboratory setup, professional operation, and high operating costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional detection methods of CAP include microbiological assay, 7 immunoassay, [8][9][10] and standard techniques, such as High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), 9,11,12 LC-MS, 13,14 and GC-MS. 15 The first two methods cannot achieve quantitative detection and are prone to false positives. 7 The traditional detection methods are reliable for the analysis of CAP but still are restricted for most instruments expensive and demand laboratory setup, professional operation, and high operating costs. Different from the traditional detection methods, electrochemical method has become one of the important methods for the efficient detection of CAP due to low operating costs, 16,17 a wide range of applications, 18,19 high sensitivity, and more importantly, it can achieve online monitoring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%