2022
DOI: 10.1134/s1054661822020067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Appearance and Behavior Anomalies in Stationary Camera Videos Using Convolutional Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As depicted in Figure 9, the recognition accuracy of FrCMs-DNNs is higher than FrCMIs, and the FrCMs-DNNs model has the best classification results. Figure 10 presents the confusion matrix of the fractional Chebyshev moments models for the PSB dataset [35] and the medical images dataset [36]. Most of the confused objects are nearly completely recognized, with a little amount of confusion between the bird/airplane and ant/octopus categories in the PSB dataset, and a small amount of confusion between the abdomen/ hip and knee/leg categories in the medical images dataset, since these categories have similar shapes.…”
Section: D Object Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As depicted in Figure 9, the recognition accuracy of FrCMs-DNNs is higher than FrCMIs, and the FrCMs-DNNs model has the best classification results. Figure 10 presents the confusion matrix of the fractional Chebyshev moments models for the PSB dataset [35] and the medical images dataset [36]. Most of the confused objects are nearly completely recognized, with a little amount of confusion between the bird/airplane and ant/octopus categories in the PSB dataset, and a small amount of confusion between the abdomen/ hip and knee/leg categories in the medical images dataset, since these categories have similar shapes.…”
Section: D Object Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%