2019
DOI: 10.3390/cells8070688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of AR-V7 in Liquid Biopsies of Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients: A Comparison of AR-V7 Analysis in Circulating Tumor Cells, Circulating Tumor RNA and Exosomes

Abstract: Detection of androgen receptor (AR) variant 7 (AR-V7) is emerging as a clinically important biomarker in castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Detection is possible from tumor tissue, which is often inaccessible in the advanced disease setting. With recent progress in detecting AR-V7 in circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) and exosomes from prostate cancer patients, liquid biopsies have emerged as an alternative to tumor biopsy. Therefore, it is important to clarify whether these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result agrees with the detection of ARV7 in PBMC of almost all samples analyzed by Qu et al [9] and with the finding by Nimir et al of ARV7 exosomal mRNA in one of five (20%) healthy volunteers, by using a droplet digital PCR-based approach [27]. We assume that the sensitivity between different works varies since we and Qu et al could detect ARFL expression in all the samples while Nimir et al could detect it in only three of five healthy subjects [27]. ARV7 expression in whole blood from non-cancer individuals was also described by Todenhöfer et al [8] and Takeuchi et al [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This result agrees with the detection of ARV7 in PBMC of almost all samples analyzed by Qu et al [9] and with the finding by Nimir et al of ARV7 exosomal mRNA in one of five (20%) healthy volunteers, by using a droplet digital PCR-based approach [27]. We assume that the sensitivity between different works varies since we and Qu et al could detect ARFL expression in all the samples while Nimir et al could detect it in only three of five healthy subjects [27]. ARV7 expression in whole blood from non-cancer individuals was also described by Todenhöfer et al [8] and Takeuchi et al [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We recently compared some of these strategies and found both fulllength AR and V7 RNA detection is more sensitive and specific if performed on CTC samples, as compared to ctRNA or exosomes. We also demonstrated that AR-V7 is detectable from CTC-RNA up to 48 h post blood draw into common EDTA vacutubes [189,190]. With improved AR-V7-specific antibody availability, CTC immunocytostaining more recently revealed that specific detection of AR-V7 in CTC nuclei is an even better predictor of OS and PFS in CRPC patients [191,192].…”
Section: Analysis Of Pca Ctcs To Explore the Ar-akt-yap Connection Anmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Splicing variants of the androgen receptor, in particular AR-V7, have been found to be significantly higher in hormone refractory prostate cancer and is associated with poor clinical outcomes [ 55 ]. Similar to BRAF-splicing variants, AR-V7 can be detected in plasma EV RNA [ 53 , 56 ]. Altogether, this supports an alternative liquid biopsy modality based on EV RNA or ctRNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%