1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(98)90020-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of avian reovirus RNA and comparison of a portion of genome segment S3 by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme fragment length polymorphism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serological classification of ARV strains has not been successful because of high cross-reactivity of the neutralizing antibodies [33]. Nowadays, genotypic classification of ARV strains is performed using RT-PCR in combination with phylogenic analysis or other molecular techniques, such as RFLP [7,26]. All phylogenic studies have classified ARV isolates into various groups and lineages; however, meta-analytically, there were no identical patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Serological classification of ARV strains has not been successful because of high cross-reactivity of the neutralizing antibodies [33]. Nowadays, genotypic classification of ARV strains is performed using RT-PCR in combination with phylogenic analysis or other molecular techniques, such as RFLP [7,26]. All phylogenic studies have classified ARV isolates into various groups and lineages; however, meta-analytically, there were no identical patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vaccine strain (Nobilis S1133) was propagated in CEF cells and treated as described above. Viral RNA was extracted from supernatants using Trizol (Gibco Brl) as per the procedural modification described by Lee et al [26]. Briefly, 1ml of Trizol was incubated with 300 μl of clarified supernatant for 5min, at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods such as virus isolation, dot-blot hybridization, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), RT-PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism, real-time RT-PCR, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay have been used in the diagnosis of ARV infection (Liu & Giambrone, 1997;Xie et al, 1997Xie et al, , 2010Lee et al, 1998;Yin & Lee, 1998;Liu et al, 1999;Guo et al, 2011). However, virus isolation is timeconsuming and the other methods require specialized equipment, which makes them difficult to apply under field conditions for rapid detection of ARV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, virus isolation [ 11 ], immunofluorescent staining [ 12 ] and immunoperoxidase histochemistry [ 13 , 14 ] offer the straight detection of viral antigens in tendon tissues. The methods for detection of ARV RNA from the cell culture [ 15 ] or from both cell cultures and tendon specimens [ 16 ] have been developed to provide a sensitive tool for the laboratory diagnosis. The serological diagnosis methods such as ELISA were also used for detection of serum antibodies in large number of samples simultaneously [ 17 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%