2009
DOI: 10.2460/javma.235.5.535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Babesia gibsoni and the canine small Babesia ‘Spanish isolate’ in blood samples obtained from dogs confiscated from dogfighting operations

Abstract: Results indicated that B gibsoni is a common parasite of dogs confiscated from dogfighting operations and suggested that dogs with a history of fighting should be evaluated for infection with B gibsoni.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
60
1
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
60
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, 18/33 (55%) American Pit bull terriers from two kennels in the Southeastern USA were positive for B. gibsoni by PCR, whereas none of the 87 dogs of other breeds from a veterinary hospital, a shelter, or a Foxhound breeding kennel in the same region were infected (Macintire et al, 2002). In another study, the prevalence of B. gibsoni infection in pit bull-type dogs confiscated from dogfighting operations and housed in shelters was 34% (Yeagley et al, 2009), similar to the 39% prevalence in the current study. The dogs with scars on the head and front limbs, which are common in dogs used for organized dogfighting, were 5.5 times more likely to be infected with B. gibsoni than were dogs without scars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similarly, 18/33 (55%) American Pit bull terriers from two kennels in the Southeastern USA were positive for B. gibsoni by PCR, whereas none of the 87 dogs of other breeds from a veterinary hospital, a shelter, or a Foxhound breeding kennel in the same region were infected (Macintire et al, 2002). In another study, the prevalence of B. gibsoni infection in pit bull-type dogs confiscated from dogfighting operations and housed in shelters was 34% (Yeagley et al, 2009), similar to the 39% prevalence in the current study. The dogs with scars on the head and front limbs, which are common in dogs used for organized dogfighting, were 5.5 times more likely to be infected with B. gibsoni than were dogs without scars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Examination of the Tosa showed the presence of many scars on the head and neck, resulting from bite wounds. Despite the fact that the owner of the Tosa dog reported tick exposure a week before, these dog bites may be important from the epidemiological point of view because studies conducted in the United States (Yeagley et al, 2009) and Australia (Jefferies et al, 2007) indicated that direct dog-to-dog transmission is very likely, most notably through bite wounds. The other case was of a young, 11-month-old American Staffordshire terrier with no history of tick exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predominant vectors for the abovementioned species are Dermacentor reticulatus (B. canis), Rhipicephalus sanguineus (B. vogeli), Haemaphysalis longicornis (B. gibsoni) and the main candidate vector of B. microti-like is Ixodes hexagonus (Solano-Gallego and Baneth, 2011). There are some reports suggesting that direct dog to dog transmission, via bite wounds, is highly likely and might possibly be the main mode of transmission of B. gibsoni (Jefferies et al, 2007;Yeagley et al, 2009). Also, it has been demonstrated that B. gibsoni infection can be transmitted transplacentally (Fukumoto et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the diagnosis of babesiosis in chronically infected and carrier dogs remains a significant challenge due to very low, often intermittent parasitemia [9]. Indeed, failure to detect parasites in animals with hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia has led to incorrect diagnoses in several documented cases [5,11]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%