2000
DOI: 10.1049/el:20000847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of blocking artifacts in compressed video

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ironically, recent developments in the field of video quality metrics are less likely to be suitable for robotic perception as their metrics are strongly tailored to the HVS or specific artefacts due to transmission or compression. For example, metrics designed to react to phenomena such as blocking [5,6,7] and ringing [8] are not particularly relevant to robotic perception. Similarly, highlevel metrics modelled on physical aspects of the HVS [3,4] were excluded.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ironically, recent developments in the field of video quality metrics are less likely to be suitable for robotic perception as their metrics are strongly tailored to the HVS or specific artefacts due to transmission or compression. For example, metrics designed to react to phenomena such as blocking [5,6,7] and ringing [8] are not particularly relevant to robotic perception. Similarly, highlevel metrics modelled on physical aspects of the HVS [3,4] were excluded.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The blockiness metric is a modification of the metric by Vlachos (Vlachos, 2000). It estimates the blockiness signal strength by comparing the cross-correlation of pixels inside (intra) and outside (inter) the borders of the coding blocking structure of a frame.…”
Section: No-reference Video Quality Metric Based On Artifact Measuremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, metrics following the NR approach such as [11,24,36] usually provide inferior quality prediction performance as compared to metrics that take into account some amount of reference information from the transmitted image, or process the whole original image itself as in case of FR metrics. Furthermore, as NR metrics provide an absolute measure about the quality of a received image, it may be difficult to distinguish quality degradations that have been induced during image transmission from those that have already been present in the image prior to transmission.…”
Section: Visual Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%