1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0934-8840(98)80122-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ticks: Immunofluorescence Assay versus Polymerase Chain Reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nested PCR approaches are generally considered more sensitive than simple PCR approaches, but in practice they are doubtlessly more susceptible to contamination and may produce more false-positive results than a simple PCR. The detection of larger numbers of Borrelia-infected ticks by IFA than by PCR is a well-known phenomenon that was documented in a multilaboratory study (17). There, intralaboratory concordance between the two techniques ranged from 40 to 100%; in our study, the concordance between the IFA and the nested PCR was 92.8% and that between the IFA and the simple PCR according to Liebisch et al was 94.1% (30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nested PCR approaches are generally considered more sensitive than simple PCR approaches, but in practice they are doubtlessly more susceptible to contamination and may produce more false-positive results than a simple PCR. The detection of larger numbers of Borrelia-infected ticks by IFA than by PCR is a well-known phenomenon that was documented in a multilaboratory study (17). There, intralaboratory concordance between the two techniques ranged from 40 to 100%; in our study, the concordance between the IFA and the nested PCR was 92.8% and that between the IFA and the simple PCR according to Liebisch et al was 94.1% (30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…False-positive IFA results can sometimes be traced back to misidentification of single Borrelia-like structures showing fluorescence (17). False-negative PCR results, on the other hand, can be explained by inhibition of DNA amplification (40), which may be a particular problem with engorged ticks due to the presence of hemoglobin (7) but which also occurs with unfed ticks because of small amounts of heme that are retained during tick molt (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BALB/c mice were infected with European strains of B. burgdorferi sensu lato by exposure to nymphal Ixodes ricinus ticks, as described previously (10,13). These ticks were field collected either in Malonne, Belgium, or Neuchâtel, Switzerland.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite our relatively low infection prevalence by PCR, Borrelia spirochetes were detected using an anti-ßagellin monoclonal antibody in 10.7% of ticks assayed in 2003. Disagreement between detection methods for B. burgdorferi has been reported (Kahl et al 1998, Gustafson et al 1989, and a higher B. burgdorferi infection rate in ticks was previously observed using IFA in comparison to PCR assay (Kahl et al 1998). Although the anti-ßagellin MAb H9724 is Borrelia-wide and will not recognize Treponema, Leptospira, or Spirochaeta, other Borrelia spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%