1999
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.37.11.3437-3442.1999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Brucellae in Blood Cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
87
1
17

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
87
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Such amounts of DNA can be expected in any blood sample from a patient with active brucellosis. The precision of the assay, with an intra-assay variation of < 1.5% and an inter-assay variation of < 6.5%, was similar to or lower than that of other PCR assays based on similar principles [23], while the diagnostic yield was 91.9%, i.e., far higher than that for blood cultures [3,4]. Melting curve analysis increased the specificity of the assay by confirming that a positive fluorescence signal obtained during the real-time PCR was associated with an amplified product with a characteristic T m .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Such amounts of DNA can be expected in any blood sample from a patient with active brucellosis. The precision of the assay, with an intra-assay variation of < 1.5% and an inter-assay variation of < 6.5%, was similar to or lower than that of other PCR assays based on similar principles [23], while the diagnostic yield was 91.9%, i.e., far higher than that for blood cultures [3,4]. Melting curve analysis increased the specificity of the assay by confirming that a positive fluorescence signal obtained during the real-time PCR was associated with an amplified product with a characteristic T m .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Attempts to isolate Brucella strains by blood culture were not successful due to the limited efficacy of Brucella isolation from blood samples processed after considerable delay. 23 However, Brucella DNA was detected by qPCR in 14 of 135 seroreactive plasma samples, 13 of which were confirmed by nested PCR and amplicon sequences of Brucella genome. As shown in Table 1, Brucella DNA-positive results were found mostly in samples reactive with RBPT, SAT, and ELISA or SAT, ELISA, and WB reactive (11/13) but two samples were reactive only with RBPT, suggesting that, despite its apparently poor specificity, RBPT could be utilized as primary screening assay and that SAT would not provide additional safety or increase specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Osteomyelitis, although not as common as arthritis, is also observed in human patients with brucellosis [9,10,60,61], and the recovery of Brucella spp. from bone marrow in brucellosis patients is more common than recovery from the blood [62]. Minimal damage to cartilage was observed, and mice did not produce robust cytokine or antibody responses (data not shown) to CII collagen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%