2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of C-terminal peptide of proteins using isotope coding strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the cleavage site was confirmed by mass spectrometry. Therefore, in vitro cleavage was performed in the presence of H 2 18 O and gel‐pieces of the full length and resulting proteolytic fragments were analysed by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) and isotope peak distribution was calculated (Julka et al , 2008). Incorporation of 18 O at the C‐terminal carboxyl group of the N‐terminal CYLD fragment, and its corresponding tryptic peptide, confirms that MALT1 directly cleaves CYLD at arginine 324 (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the cleavage site was confirmed by mass spectrometry. Therefore, in vitro cleavage was performed in the presence of H 2 18 O and gel‐pieces of the full length and resulting proteolytic fragments were analysed by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) and isotope peak distribution was calculated (Julka et al , 2008). Incorporation of 18 O at the C‐terminal carboxyl group of the N‐terminal CYLD fragment, and its corresponding tryptic peptide, confirms that MALT1 directly cleaves CYLD at arginine 324 (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C‐termini identification methods have been developed during the latest two decades . Among them, some methods involving novel C‐termini enrichment attracted more attention in the proteome‐era .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably the simplest and more straightforward strategy to flag C‐terminal peptides in MS spectra is enzymatic 18 O‐labeling . In this strategy, protein digestion is performed in H 2 18 O containing buffer, resulting in the protease‐assisted incorporation of one or two oxygen‐18 atoms at the carboxyl moiety of the hydrolyzed peptide bond, leaving the carboxyl moiety of the original C‐terminal peptide unmodified (Fig.…”
Section: Ms‐based Methods For C‐terminal Sequencing Of Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this strategy holds quite some limitations. Given that the rate of cleavage by the CPs strongly depends on the peptide sequence, this method typically requires careful optimization of the reaction conditions, making it overall quite laborious and requiring relatively high amounts of sample .…”
Section: C‐terminal Sequence Analysis: a Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%