2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of cardiac arrhythmia in electrocardiograms using adaptive feature extraction and modified support vector machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SVM is widely used for ECG classification due to its simplicity, robustness and efficiency [2,3], which was confirmed in our previous study, too [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…SVM is widely used for ECG classification due to its simplicity, robustness and efficiency [2,3], which was confirmed in our previous study, too [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The selected algorithms are fast and the results easy to interpret, as shown in both [36,40]. Once the P and T waves and the complex QRS are detected, an automatic diagnosis can be performed by using databases with different pathologies, the most common being MIT-BIH Arrhythmia, on which classifiers as SVM [41], KNN [42], decision rules [43] are applied. Given that any classifier can be applied to the database to generate a predictive model, this field was not considered very important.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, a basic functionality for detecting problems is included, although it is not necessarily a diagnostic system because the hardware is not considered safe for application in serious diseases. Previous studies [41] generated classifiers, such as SVM, from a trained database [46], and were able to reach an accuracy rate of near to 90%.…”
Section: Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach we proposed attains an F 1 -Score of 0.992 that is the weighted average score of 10-fold cross-validation with 10% testing data and 90% training data. Compared with available studies [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] , the approach we proposed achieved the highest accuracy score by using all the data files in MIT-BIH database.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%