2002
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.10004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of CD16low neutrophil subpopulations

Abstract: Background The success of complex molecular cytogenetic studies depends on having properly spread chromosomes. However, inconsistency of optimum chromosome spreading remains a major problem in cytogenetic studies. Methods The metaphase spreading process was carefully timed to identify the most critical phase of chromosome spreading. The effects of dropping height of cell suspension, slide condition, drying time, fixative ratio, and relative humidity on the quality of metaphase spreads were studied by quantitat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, samples from conventionally treated patients contain more of these CD16 low cells (Supplementary Figure 3). The CD33 + CD16 low cells detected in our samples seem to be identical with the recently described CD16 low granulocytic subset (37-39). Indeed, it is known for some years that granulocytes reduce their CD16 surface expression during activation (40, 41).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, samples from conventionally treated patients contain more of these CD16 low cells (Supplementary Figure 3). The CD33 + CD16 low cells detected in our samples seem to be identical with the recently described CD16 low granulocytic subset (37-39). Indeed, it is known for some years that granulocytes reduce their CD16 surface expression during activation (40, 41).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…CD16 b low was evaluated by direct staining with the following monoclonal antibodies CD49d‐FITC (44H6, Immunotech, Beckman Coulter Company), CD16‐PE (G38; Caltag‐Invitrogen, California, CA, USA), CD45‐TC (J33; Cytognos, Salamanca, Spain) or using the combination of CD16‐FITC (3G8; Caltag‐Invitrogen), CD56‐PE (B159; BD) and CD3‐PE‐Cy5 (UCHT1; e‐Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) and isotype‐matched antibodies. Samples were acquired and analyzed using R3 strategy of region intersections (Riera et al. , 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD16 is usually expressed on the surface of neutrophils [17] and is seen as a neutrophil maturation marker [18]. Lower expression of CD16 by neutrophils was seen in several diseases and in states of neutropenia [19]. Monocytes were gated as SSC DIM CD45 DIM and, to ensure that B cells or T cells did not contaminate the gate, as CD3 -CD19 -.…”
Section: Whole Blood Lymphocyte Phenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%