2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of chicken carcasses contaminated with Salmonella enterica serovar in the abattoir environment of Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…contamination in meat. This finding was in a line with results from other studies demonstrating laughter equipment including tables, gloves, baskets as well as the slaughterhouse environment as the sources of cross-contamination for carcasses [ 15 , 52 , 63 66 ]. Additionally, we found an association between open or semi-closed slaughterhouses and a higher risk of Salmonella spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…contamination in meat. This finding was in a line with results from other studies demonstrating laughter equipment including tables, gloves, baskets as well as the slaughterhouse environment as the sources of cross-contamination for carcasses [ 15 , 52 , 63 66 ]. Additionally, we found an association between open or semi-closed slaughterhouses and a higher risk of Salmonella spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The differences in the frequencies of isolation of Salmonella in the samples between and within the four processing plants, could be due in part, to the different management, production, and risk factors at these plants. These findings were not surprising because other studies have reported progressive increases in the frequency of contamination with Salmonella during processing [60,61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Although Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium are among the most prevalent serotypes, in recent years, other serovars (previously uncommon) have emerged. For example, Lin et al (2020) identified 156 Salmonella isolates, and among them, S. Albany (41.7%), S. Schwarzengrund (20.5%), S. Kentucky (12.8%), and S. Tennessee (5.1%) are the most commonly isolated serovars. S. Newport (56.8%) was the preponderant serovar in samples collected from 10 irrigation ponds in produce farms over a 2-year period ( Li et al, 2014 ); furthermore, S. Corvallis exhibits resistance to a wide range of antibiotics ( Ma et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%