Background
To explore the long-term oncological safety of using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery for acute obstructive colorectal cancer by comparing the pathological results of emergency surgery (ES) with elective surgery after the placement of SEMS.
Methods
Studies comparing SEMS as a bridge to surgery with emergency surgery for acute obstructive colorectal cancer were retrieved through the databases of Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries, and a meta-analysis was conducted based on the pathological results of the two treatments. Risk ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the outcomes under random effects model.
Results
A total of 27 studies were included, including 3 randomized controlled studies, 2 prospective studies, and 22 retrospective studies, with a total of 3737 patients. The presence of perineural invasion (RRโ=โ0.58, 95% CI 0.48, 0.71, Pโ<โ0.00001), lymphovascular invasion (RRโ=โ0.68, 95% CI 0.47, 0.99, Pโ=โ0.004) and vascular invasion (RRโ=โ0.66, 95% CI 0.45, 0.99, Pโ=โ0.04) in SEMS group were significantly higher than those in ES group, and there was no significant difference in lymphatic invasion (RRโ=โ0.92, 95% CI 0.77, 1.09, Pโ=โ0.33). The number of lymph nodes harvested in SEMS group was significantly higher than that in ES group (MDโ=โโโ3.18, 95% CI โโ4.47, โโ1.90, Pโ<โ0.00001). While no significant difference was found in the number of positive lymph nodes (MDโ=โโโ0.11, 95% CI โโ0.63, 0.42, Pโ=โ0.69) and N stage [N0 (RRโ=โ1.03, 95% CI 0.92, 1.15, Pโ=โ0.60), N1 (RRโ=โ0.99, 95% CI 0.87, 1.14, Pโ=โ0.91), N2 (RRโ=โ0.94, 95% CI 0.77, 1.15, Pโ=โ0.53)].
Conclusions
SEMS implantation in patients with acute malignant obstructive colorectal cancer may lead to an increase in adverse tumor pathological characteristics, and these characteristics are mostly related to the poor prognosis of colorectal cancer. Although the adverse effect of SEMS on long-term survival has not been demonstrated, their adverse effects cannot be ignored. The use of SEMS as the preferred treatment for patients with resectable obstructive colorectal cancer remains to be carefully weighed, especially when patients are young or the surgical risk is not very high.