2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of daptomycin-nonsusceptible strains using the Neo-Sensitab™ prediffusion method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediffusion method has been described for the detection of colistin-resistance, daptomycin-nonsusceptible strains, and the hVISA/VISA phenotype. 2 , 23 , 32 Although this screening method is not expensive and might represent a simpler alternative for hVISA detection in clinical laboratories, it has not been extensively evaluated. Despite the two false positives, we had acceptable results with the prediffusion method (2/3 hVISA isolates detected).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prediffusion method has been described for the detection of colistin-resistance, daptomycin-nonsusceptible strains, and the hVISA/VISA phenotype. 2 , 23 , 32 Although this screening method is not expensive and might represent a simpler alternative for hVISA detection in clinical laboratories, it has not been extensively evaluated. Despite the two false positives, we had acceptable results with the prediffusion method (2/3 hVISA isolates detected).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were interpreted following the manufacturer's recommendation: vancomycin inhibition zone diameter ≤22 mm and/or teicoplanin inhibition zone diameter <20 mm were considered as a positive result. 23 , 38…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though this is not the first report of the 15 isolates with acquired resistance, belonging to the population with the smaller inhibition zones. Further improvements as done byKatz et al (2008), namely using a shorter second incubation period (6 hours instead of 18 hours), may offer a faster and more As many laboratories still rely on the cheaper disk diffusion test, the emergence of colistin resistance may be missed, as demonstrated in this study. It is clear that this type of resistance needs to be monitored closely, using the appropriate test methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%