2013
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Using a Two‐System Multiplex‐PCR Protocol

Abstract: The protocol is specific for DEC Shigella and is suitable for clinical laboratories.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, serotyping is rarely sufficient to reliably identify a strain as diarrheagenic. In this study, we used multiplex PCR for detection of virulence genes that characterize the DEC pathotypes [11]. The DEC strains ranked third among the enteropathogens recovered, with a frequency of 5.2%, with atypical EPEC being the predominant pathotype among them (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, serotyping is rarely sufficient to reliably identify a strain as diarrheagenic. In this study, we used multiplex PCR for detection of virulence genes that characterize the DEC pathotypes [11]. The DEC strains ranked third among the enteropathogens recovered, with a frequency of 5.2%, with atypical EPEC being the predominant pathotype among them (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strains are increasingly being implicated as important causes of gastroenteritis around the world [3]. In Switzerland, a frequency of 8% of DEC was found among children with diarrhea [20], while among Caribbean-Colombian children, a rate of 14.4% was reported [26], and in Brazil, rates from 7.6% to 48% [11,[27][28][29][30] have been reported. In India, a frequency of 52% of DEC was found among children under five years of age with diarrhea [31], and in Ghana, these bacteria were recovered from 77% of children and 38% of adults with diarrhea [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Detection assays rely on the amplification of eltA alone, eltA plus either sta1 or sta2, or all three toxin genes. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The DNA hybridization assay is a culture-dependent method that requires transfer of cultured lactose-positive colonies from MacConkey agar to Whatman filter paper (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) followed by cell lysis and probe hybridization. Probes targeting ST P (sta1), ST H (sta2), and LT (eltA) are then used for ETEC detection 17,18 ; remarkably, many clinical manuscripts reporting the prevalence of ETEC use this less-sensitive DNA hybridization method or use PCR assays that target eltA plus only a single allele of ST. As a result, these studies are likely to have underestimated the prevalence of ETEC infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%