2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0035-9203(00)90243-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of ehrlichiae in African ticks by polymerase chain reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
151
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
151
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They may represent novel bacteria. Clearly, the specificity of our broad-spectrum primers for ehrlichia-like bacteria (primers EHR16SR and EHR16SD) is not absolute, although they were designed to amplify a 345-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene specific for the members of the family Anaplasmataceae and have successfully been used as epidemiologic tools in Africa and Japan (8,15,17). Our first hypothesis regarding these sequences was to consider them nonspecific amplification products as a result of a PCR or sequencing error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They may represent novel bacteria. Clearly, the specificity of our broad-spectrum primers for ehrlichia-like bacteria (primers EHR16SR and EHR16SD) is not absolute, although they were designed to amplify a 345-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene specific for the members of the family Anaplasmataceae and have successfully been used as epidemiologic tools in Africa and Japan (8,15,17). Our first hypothesis regarding these sequences was to consider them nonspecific amplification products as a result of a PCR or sequencing error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA extracted from the ticks was also screened as described previously with primers EHR16SR and EHR16SD (Bioprobe Systems), which amplify a 345-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria within the family Anaplasmataceae, including the genera Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, Neorickettsia, and Wolbachia (17). To amplify the main part of the 16S rRNA gene, tick DNA samples that were found to be positive with the primers described above were subjected to a second PCR with primers EHR16SR and EHR16SD coupled with universal primers fD1 and rp2, as described previously (8).…”
Section: Tickmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para la familia Anaplasmataceae se utilizaron oligonucleótidos para un fragmento de 16S ARNr 21 , utilizándose como control positivo A. bovis. A las muestras positivas se les realizó dos RPC específicas para A. platys: fragmento de 16S ARNr y del gen groESL, según los procedimientos indicados por los autores 22,23 .…”
Section: Amplificaciónunclassified
“…All of the noninfected animals had normal values for all three hematological parameters (i.e., RBC count, Hb, and HCT); hence, other agents that could have contributed to the anemia among the animals could be ruled out. In addition, all the DNA samples were PCR screened for the presence of Anaplasma species as described previously (9,12). Because only a single animal in the noninfected category was found to be infected with Anaplasma bovis, possible involvement of anaplasmosis as a cause of the anemia could be excluded.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%