2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00433-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of enteroviruses in treated drinking water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…En este sentido, es necesario intensificar los esfuerzos para detectar y En este análisis se demostró la persistencia de los virus entéricos después del tratamiento del agua para consumo humano en algunos municipios de Colombia. En varios países se ha reportado la presencia de virus en aguas tratadas (14,15,(30)(31)(32). Los datos de la vigilancia de la calidad del agua en Colombia evidencian que existe un alto porcentaje de fuentes de agua que no cumplen con el patrón de potabilidad según los indicadores bacteriológicos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En este sentido, es necesario intensificar los esfuerzos para detectar y En este análisis se demostró la persistencia de los virus entéricos después del tratamiento del agua para consumo humano en algunos municipios de Colombia. En varios países se ha reportado la presencia de virus en aguas tratadas (14,15,(30)(31)(32). Los datos de la vigilancia de la calidad del agua en Colombia evidencian que existe un alto porcentaje de fuentes de agua que no cumplen con el patrón de potabilidad según los indicadores bacteriológicos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…After a 14-day incubation period, which included a blind passage at day 7 post-infection, the infected cells were harvested for molecular analysis for human adenoviruses [21] and enteroviruses [20], as well as for blind passage onto monolayers of Vero African Green Monkey cell line (ECACC 84113001) in cell culture tubes with flying coverslips. After a further incubation of 7 days at 37 xC, the infected cell cultures were examined for cytopathic effects, stained with haematoxylin and eosin and examined for virusspecific inclusion bodies [22].…”
Section: Virus Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral recovery and concentration techniques include ultrafiltration (Soule et al 2000;Divizia et al 1989a;Garin et al 1994), adsorption-elution using filters or membranes (Gilgen et al 1997;Passagot et al 1985;Senouci et al 1996), glass wool (Vilaginès et al 1993;Vilaginès et al 1997) or glass powder (Gajardo et al 1991;Menut et al 1993), two-phase separation with polymers (Schwab et al 1993), flocculation (Nasser et al 1995;Backer 2002), and the use of monolithic chromatographic columns (Branovic et al 2003;Kramberger et al 2004;Kovac et al 2009;Gutierrez-Aguirre et al 2009). The use of the glass wool adsorption-elution procedure for the recovery of enteric viruses from large volumes of water has proven to be a cost-effective method and has successfully been applied for the routine recovery of human enteric viruses from large volumes of water in the South African setting (Taylor et al 2001;Van Heerden et al 2004, 2005Vivier et al 2001Vivier et al , 2002Vivier et al , 2004, 2006Venter 2004). This method can be adapted for the in-line recovery of viruses from water (Grabow et al 1996) which circumvents transporting of large volumes of potentially highly polluted water great distances to a central laboratory which would be expensive and a potential health hazard.…”
Section: Sampling For Viruses In Watermentioning
confidence: 99%