2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.5.124401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of evolving Lagrangian coherent structures: A multiple object tracking approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolving network approach works well when sufficiently strong spectral gaps exist such that short-term variations due to systematic errors or noise do not cause the recent clustering to deviate strongly from the preceding one, such as also required in Ref. 35.…”
Section: B Evolving Cluster Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evolving network approach works well when sufficiently strong spectral gaps exist such that short-term variations due to systematic errors or noise do not cause the recent clustering to deviate strongly from the preceding one, such as also required in Ref. 35.…”
Section: B Evolving Cluster Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These similarity measures quickly become meaningless due to turbulent dispersion, causing Lagrangian approaches to fail for long-term investigations in fully turbulent flows. One first attempt to overcome this problem is to follow coherent sets from short-time computations by means of a multiple object tracking method 35 . However, such procedure strongly relies on the capability of the underlying clustering algorithm to identify reliable structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of determining when coherent structures are born and when they die is largely unaddressed in the dynamical systems literature. To quote MacMillan et al [45]: "One major shortcoming of these (LCS) techniques, however, is the lack of an objective procedure for identifying time scales of interest, or an ability to characterise the lives, deaths, or age of coherent structures, especially when relevant flow time scales are larger than the time scales associated with coherence." Several previous studies have investigated lifetimes in the context of ocean eddies, for example, Froyland et al [20] first identified a suitable timescale and then carried out a series of FTCS computations on time windows sliding forward in time, Andrade et al [3] exhaustively search a discretised twoparameter space (𝑡, 𝑇) where 𝑡 is the initial time and 𝑇 is the flow duration, using these pairs as variable inputs to many separate LCS computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quote MacMillan et al. [45]: “One major shortcoming of these (LCS) techniques, however, is the lack of an objective procedure for identifying time scales of interest, or an ability to characterise the lives, deaths, or age of coherent structures, especially when relevant flow time scales are larger than the time scales associated with coherence.” Several previous studies have investigated lifetimes in the context of ocean eddies, for example, Froyland et al. [20] first identified a suitable timescale and then carried out a series of FTCS computations on time windows sliding forward in time, Andrade et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of determining when coherent structures are born and when they die is largely unaddressed in the dynamical systems literature. To quote MacMillan et al [MOR20]: "One major shortcoming of these (LCS) techniques, however, is the lack of an objective procedure for identifying time scales of interest, or an ability to characterise the lives, deaths, or age of coherent structures, especially when relevant flow time scales are larger than the time scales associated with coherence." Several previous studies have investigated lifetimes in the context of ocean eddies, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%