2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ascom.2022.100555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of extragalactic Ultra-compact dwarfs and Globular Clusters using Explainable AI techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the trained models reach good performance levels and are suitable for detecting GCs in photometric data. Our results agree with a recent study evaluating explainable machine learning for extracting ultra-compact dwarfs and GCs from ground-based imaging of the Fornax cluster, which reports true positives rates of 0.89−0.97 and false discovery rates of 0.04−0.07 (Mohammadi et al 2022), although on a much smaller data set of ∼7700 sources containing ∼500 GCs and for six instead of only two bands, making an exact comparison impossible. Recently published studies on detecting star clusters from HST data using machine learning also report similar results: Pérez et al ( 2021) use a CNN (StarcNet) and a data set of ∼15 000 sources from the LEGUS galaxies with observations in five bands for training, validation, and testing.…”
Section: Model Performance and Generalisation To New Datasupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the trained models reach good performance levels and are suitable for detecting GCs in photometric data. Our results agree with a recent study evaluating explainable machine learning for extracting ultra-compact dwarfs and GCs from ground-based imaging of the Fornax cluster, which reports true positives rates of 0.89−0.97 and false discovery rates of 0.04−0.07 (Mohammadi et al 2022), although on a much smaller data set of ∼7700 sources containing ∼500 GCs and for six instead of only two bands, making an exact comparison impossible. Recently published studies on detecting star clusters from HST data using machine learning also report similar results: Pérez et al ( 2021) use a CNN (StarcNet) and a data set of ∼15 000 sources from the LEGUS galaxies with observations in five bands for training, validation, and testing.…”
Section: Model Performance and Generalisation To New Datasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These studies apply various machine learning methods with success and typically report 90% success fractions for identifying bright, symmetric star clusters. While the aforementioned works focused on young or resolved star clusters, identification of (old) GCs with machine learning methods has been recently studied by Mohammadi et al (2022). In this work, random forest (RF) and Localized Generalized Matrix Learning Vector Quantization (LGMLVQ) classifiers are used to identify ∼500 GCs and ultracompact dwarf galaxies in multi-wavelength ground-based photometric data of ∼7700 sources in the Fornax galaxy cluster with promising results (see also Saifollahi et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a classification problem, selection of star clusters is well suited to machine learning techniques. Recent experiments with machine learning selection of clusters on either images (Pérez et al 2021;Thilker et al 2022) or photometric catalogs (Barbisan et al 2022;Mohammadi et al 2022) show promise. Samples of star clusters, foreground stars and background galaxies from space based imaging (HST or JWST) can be used to train and validate classification techniques with Rubin data; other efforts (photometric redshift pipelines from the LSST Galaxies collaboration, star-galaxy separation techniques from SMWLV collaboration) may also prove useful.…”
Section: Source Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretable machine learning techniques (Localized General Matrix LVQ and RF) were used in Mohammadi et al (2022) to detect extragalactic Ultra-compact dwarfs and Globular Clusters. Authors analysed the importance of features and compared them with features that carry physical information of the objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%