Detection of Fabrication in Photocopy Document Using Texture Features Through K-Means Clustering

Patgar, Suman V; Y.H, Sharath Kumar; Vasudev, T

doi:10.5121/sipij.2014.5403

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The next stage considers the image and segment variable regions from the document image for detection of fabrication in the segmented area [12]. The segmented part is used to detect fabrication in the variable region [4,10,13].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As the area/ region of fabrication in the document is relatively smaller, compared to entire document it is quite hard to take decision whether the document is fabricated or non-fabricated. Hence it is favorable to employ all the three methods to check for the fabrication [4,10,13]. The content in the variable region is decided as fabricated when one or more of the approaches lead to the classification as fabricated class.…”

Section: Proposed Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A System for Detection of Fabrication in Photocopy Document

Patgar¹,

Vasudev²,

Murali³

2015

Computer Science &Amp; Information Technology ( CS &Amp; IT )

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Photocopy documents are very common in our normal life. In India, people are permitted to carry and produce photocopied documents frequently, to avoid damages or losing the original documents. But this provision is misused for temporary benefits by fabricating fake photocopied documents. When a photocopied document is produced, it may be required to check for its originality. An attempt is made in this direction to detect such fabricated photocopied documents. This paper proposes an unsupervised system to detect fabrication in photocopied document. The work in this paper mainly focuses on detection of fabrication in photocopied documents in which some contents are manipulated by new contents above it using different ways. Testing is performed with a different set of collected testing samples resulted in an average detection rate of 70.14%.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Proposed Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%