2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00083-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of feigned recognition memory impairment using the old/new effect of the event-related potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results support Clark and Johnson (1970)"s finding that the pupil effect is not under voluntary control and show that it is independent of participants" actual response. A similar argument has been made concerning the ERP old/new effect, and has been used to support its potential use as an index of malingering (Tardif et al, 2000;van Hooff et al, 2009). In a recent study, however, the ERP old/new effect was not observed in a group of participants instructed to malinger (Vagnini, Berry, Clark, & Jiang, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results support Clark and Johnson (1970)"s finding that the pupil effect is not under voluntary control and show that it is independent of participants" actual response. A similar argument has been made concerning the ERP old/new effect, and has been used to support its potential use as an index of malingering (Tardif et al, 2000;van Hooff et al, 2009). In a recent study, however, the ERP old/new effect was not observed in a group of participants instructed to malinger (Vagnini, Berry, Clark, & Jiang, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For example earlier and larger parietal late positive components (LPCs) have been found in response to the presentation of old learned items compared to new items during recognition memory (Warren, 1980;van Hooff, Brunia, & Allen, 1996;Friedman & Johnson, 2000). One potential role for psychophysiological indices of mnemonic processes such as the ERP and pupil old/new effects is in identifying people who feign memory loss (eg Browndyke et al, 2008;Tardif, Barry, Fox, & Johnstone, 2000;van Hooff, Sargeant, Foster, & Schmand, 2009). Tardif et al (2000) for example reasoned that if the ERP old/new effect is not under conscious control then it should be detectable in people feigning amnesia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, equivalent LPC amplitudes are found no matter whether participants responded truthfully or deceptively in a task (R. J. Johnson, Barnhardt, & Zhu, 2003;Tardif, Barry, Fox, & Johnstone, 2000). Amnesic patients with bilateral lesions of the hippocampus show preserved N400 effects but an absence of LPC effects (Addante, Ranganath, Olichney, & Yonelinas, 2012;Duzel, Vargha-Khadem, Heinze, & Mishkin, 2001;Olichney, et al, 2000), consistent with the role of this ERP component in episodic memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Therefore, preparation for realization of one voluntary movement or another usually correlates with intense inhibitory synaptic processes developing in the cerebral cortex and cortex-associated CNS structures. It is not necessary to discuss the importance of cortical inhibition; we should only remember that the ratio of numbers of excitatory and inhibitory axo-somatic synapses on cortical pyramidal neurons (i.e., synapses localized on "strategically important" sites of the membrane of these neurons) is 1:4 [6][7][8]. However, most studies dealing with examination of the role of cortical neurons in the control of targeted behavioral acts mostly analyzed excitatory reactions of these cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%