2015
DOI: 10.1177/1098612x15574757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of feline coronavirus in cerebrospinal fluid for diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis in cats with and without neurological signs

Abstract: Although it is known that RT-PCR can give false positive results, especially if performed using serum or plasma, this real-time RT-PCR detecting FCoV RNA in CSF can be considered a reliable specific tool for the diagnosis of FIP. If only cats with neurological involvement are evaluated, the sensitivity of this real-time RT-PCR in CSF is also high.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
54
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 699 tissue, fluid and faeces samples were analysed from 102 cats, 57 with FIP and 45 without FIP. This is a marked increase in the number of samples analysed as compared to most previous studies [20,21,29,30], and contains similar numbers of effusion samples to two previous studies [19,31]. Some studies have examined the use of FCoV RT-PCR alone in the diagnosis of FIP using fluid samples [29,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In total, 699 tissue, fluid and faeces samples were analysed from 102 cats, 57 with FIP and 45 without FIP. This is a marked increase in the number of samples analysed as compared to most previous studies [20,21,29,30], and contains similar numbers of effusion samples to two previous studies [19,31]. Some studies have examined the use of FCoV RT-PCR alone in the diagnosis of FIP using fluid samples [29,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This is a marked increase in the number of samples analysed as compared to most previous studies [20,21,29,30], and contains similar numbers of effusion samples to two previous studies [19,31]. Some studies have examined the use of FCoV RT-PCR alone in the diagnosis of FIP using fluid samples [29,31]. Other studies [19,21] compared FCoV RT-PCR to FCoV RT-PCR in combination with characterisation of S gene mutations in the diagnosis of FIP using body cavity fluids, these derived similar sensitivity (72 to 85% for FCoV RT-PCR alone and 60 to 64% for FCoV RT-PCR and S gene mutations characterisation) and specificity (100% for both FCoV RT-PCR alone and FCoV RT-PCR and S gene mutations characterisation) as obtained in this study (sensitivity 78.4% for FCoV RT-PCR alone and 60% FCoV RT-PCR and S gene mutations characterisation; specificity 97.9 and 97.9% respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, the combined serological and molecular protocol should improve the ability of laboratories to diagnose effusive FIP, especially if the test results are supported by clinical and haematological findings. However, intravitam diagnosis of non-effusive FIP still remains highly inconclusive, even if recent studies tried to address this issue (Doenges et al, 2016). Therefore, future studies are needed to develop and validate tools for the intra-vitam diagnosis of non-effusive FIP, which still represents a challenge for veterinary diagnosticians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a second incubation period, the plate was washed and examined with a fluorescent microscope, and the antibody titer noted was expressed as the highest sample dilution with a positive reaction. In addition, CSF samples from 24 CSF antibody-positive and 21 CSF antibody negative cats were subjected to FCoV RT-PCR using the P205-P211 primer pair [13, 18] for definitive diagnosis of FIP, as the demonstration of FCoV RNA in CSF is highly suggestive of FIP [1, 8]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSF FCoV RNA was detected in all of 11 Group B cats in which RT-PCR assay was performed. It is considered that when FCoV RNA is detected in CSF, that animal is very likely to have FIP [1, 8]. Furthermore, the S/C of Group B cats (8 or lower) was markedly lower than normal range (256–2,048) [5, 11, 21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%