1994
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(94)90078-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of feline coronaviruses in cell cultures and in fresh and fixed feline tissues using polymerase chain reaction

Abstract: Feline coronavirus infections in cell cultures and in fresh and fixed feline tissues were detected using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. Cell cultures were inoculated with feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV), feline enteric coronavirus (FECV) or sham inoculum. The tissue samples of liver, kidney and spleen were taken from specific-pathogen-free (SPF) cats that were inoculated intranasally with 10(3) TCID50 of FIPV 79-1146 (n = 10), FIPV UCD1 (n = 3) or sham inoculum (n = 3), from clinical cats (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, such steps increase the risk of inaccuracy and contamination. Several RT-PCR assays have been developed to detect FCoV (Li and Scott, 1994;Herrewegh et al, 1995;Gamble et al, 1997). Two of those assays are nested PCRs and in all of those ethidium bromide staining and UV light transillumination of electrophoretically separated PCR products is necessary to detect PCR products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, such steps increase the risk of inaccuracy and contamination. Several RT-PCR assays have been developed to detect FCoV (Li and Scott, 1994;Herrewegh et al, 1995;Gamble et al, 1997). Two of those assays are nested PCRs and in all of those ethidium bromide staining and UV light transillumination of electrophoretically separated PCR products is necessary to detect PCR products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based methods have been suggested in detection of the positive-stranded FCoV RNA, but none of these were designed to be quantitative (Li and Scott, 1994;Herrewegh et al, 1995;Gamble et al, 1997). In addition, conventional PCR methods are time consuming due to several post-amplification steps, contain a certain risk of cross-contamination between the samples due to a separate labor-intensive reverse transcription (RT) step and a second PCR step in nested PCR systems, are limited in sensitivity and allow only relatively few samples to be processed at one time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a number of studies, RT-PCR techniques have been used to detect FCoV in samples from clinical FIP cases (Li and Scott, 1994;Egberink et al, 1995;Herrewegh et al, 1995Herrewegh et al, , 1997Fehr et al, 1996;Richter et al, 1996). While some of these studies have involved fresh or formalin-fixed tissue (Li and Scott, 1994), in others plasma, serum, ascitic or pleural fluids have been examined Herrewegh et al, 1995Herrewegh et al, , 1997Fehr et al, 1996;Richter et al, 1996). We found virus in approximately 80% of blood samples from confirmed cases of FIP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recently developed reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays, using primers targeted to highly conserved regions of the viral genome (3 -UTR (untranslated region) (Herrewegh et al, 1995;Fehr et al, 1996), or S-protein gene (Li and Scott, 1994;Gamble et al, 1997)), which are common to all FCoV strains, became a valuable tool for the detection of FCoV nucleic acid in blood, body cavity effusions, faeces and tissue samples of infected cats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%